My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 04/12/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2018
>
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 04/12/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:52:26 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 8:52:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
04/12/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Hardin asked for additional details on design standards and quality. He asked if the <br /> roads would be private and therefore not maintained by the City. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that although the product is different than <br /> the other side of the development, the products would meet the minimum design standards of <br /> The COR. He noted that this would be a detached product with rear-loaded garages and private <br /> roads that would be maintained by the Homeowners Association. He noted that the adjacent <br /> neighborhoods also have privately maintained roads. <br /> Member Hardin asked if the Planning Commission has reviewed the request. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the Planning Commission has reviewed <br /> the case twice on conceptual levels. He noted that the primary discussion thus far has been the <br /> private road connections and noted that a more thorough discussion will occur when the <br /> Preliminary Plat is submitted. <br /> Chairperson Steffen noted that initially there were three options presented for layout and design <br /> and asked if that has been narrowed down. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that one layout has been chosen. <br /> Member LeTourneau referenced the right-of-reentry agreement and asked for details on what <br /> would trigger that element. <br /> Economic Dev. Mgr/Assistant City Administrator Brama provided additional details, noting that <br /> the trigger would be whether investments and improvements have been made to the site. He <br /> stated that if improvements have been made, the City could enact penalties rather than attempt to <br /> take the property back. <br /> Member Riley stated that the right-of-reentry is there to protect the City and ensure that the <br /> desired outcome is achieved. He stated that the agreement encourages the developer to build the <br /> project as planned, noting that the City does not want to take the property back. <br /> Member LeTourneau agreed that the primary intent is to have the City owned property sold and <br /> in the hands of a developer but also to build the community. He agreed that the right-of-reentry <br /> helps to stimulate the development and ensure that it does not remain vacant for years. <br /> Chairperson Steffen noted that the right-of-reentry specifies 15 homes but there are many more <br /> homes included on the plan. <br /> Economic Dev. Mgr/Assistant City Administrator Brama stated that it is difficult for the <br /> developer to commit to a large number of homes developed as the real estate market is unknown <br /> and therefore has difficulty committing to things beyond their control. He noted that this <br /> agreement is consistent with other developments, as the City does not require full build out in the <br /> agreement, for a single family home project. <br /> Economic Development Authority/April 12, 2018 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.