Laserfiche WebLink
no approved site plan in place and the developer has to start over. The developer is seeking to <br />use the prior site plan again, but development applications must adhere to the current zoning <br />standards, and the old site plan does not reflect newer wetland setbacks. Also, the road <br />alignment is necessarily changing somewhat from the original plan. The old plan is therefore <br />non -compliant and inaccurate, and a revised plan must be submitted. <br />It may also be noted that the revised plan would be considered a "major change" from the <br />former (but now lapsed) plan because of the change in road location and the fact that the <br />original development schedule expired long ago. See City Code § 117-123(e) (describing <br />major changes requiring re -submission of a site plan and a rezoning application). The new <br />wetland setback is also a major change to the plan. While this Code provision refers to major <br />changes between preliminary and final site plans, it also logically supports the notion that a <br />significantly changed new plan must go through the rezoning process. <br />2 <br />