02/03/05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Chairperson introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #05-02- A RESOLUTION DECLARING TERMs OF A VARIANCE TO THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AND LOT AREA IN THE CRITICAL RIVER OVERLAY DISTRICT. WHEREAS, on FebrumT 3, 2005, the Ramsey Board of Adjustment issued a variance fi'om Section 9.21.07 of the Ramsey City Code which allows for substandard lot size and width on the property legally described as follows: Lot t Block 1 Bowers Mississippi Acres 2''d Addition TOG/W Lot 33 Bowers Mississippi Acres, Anoka County, Minnesota (the "Subject Property") NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. Based on Findings of Fact # , a variance to lot width and lot area is hereby granted in to render Lot 1 Block 1 Bowers Mississippi Acres 2nd Addition a buildable lot. 2. That Lot 1 Block l Bowers Mississippi Acres 2'~d Addition and Lot 33 Bowers Mississippi Acres will be .97 and .95 in size respectively, and each will be 100 feet in width. That Lot 1 Block 1 Bowers Mississippi Acres 2nd Addition will not be eligible for a building permit until such time as Anoka County has assigned a separate Parcel Identification Number That the Applicant, or future owner, is subject to the Building Permit process and must comply with all International Building Code requirements at such time that a new dwelling is constructed. That at such time when construction of a new dwelling occurs, the Applicant, or future owner, shall adhere to the Department of Natural Resource's suggested actions as outlined in the letter dated January 21,2005 to help mitigate the impacts of construction. 6. That the Applicant, or future owner, is subject to applicable regulations in the Critical River Overlay District and the underlying zoning regulations. 7. That the Applicant shall be responsible for all City costs incurred in administering and enforcing this variance. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: