Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/12/2018

Home

Mr. Riverblood explained thatthe other way that the proposed land could remain in the public domain is if a particularly subdivision would have greater densities, necessitating open space. Another example is if it was a PUD that requires open space over and above Park Dedication. In any of those scenarios particular land is in the Mississippi River critical area, which encourages land protection along sensitive areas. Riverblood continued that the landowner concerned about that is present tonight and may wish to speak to the Commission. Dave Nathe, Riverside Farms, 15238 Adams Street NW, Elk River; and also 144534 Llama Street; Mr. Nathe indicated he has lived in the area since 1971, and he purchased the farm in 1996. In 2003, he was approached for this bridge site that was supposed to come on the property. A plan was made so he knew where the development would be. The bridge site did not go through. In his opinion, taking that land for park will take all of his river lots. He stated that there are plenty of parks around, and many of them are empty. He indicated that he is already stuck with a solar farm, as a result of the County. And if this bridge site goes in, his land will not be worth anything. Chair Bennett thanked Mr. Nathe for coming before the Commission and sharing his comments. Chair Bennett asked whether there are proposed changes for this area, from the 2030 to the 2040 Comp Plan. Mr. Riverblood indicated the proposed park plan for the area in question remains the same from the 2030 Comp P Chair Bennett stated the existing plan was written ten years ago. This is a plan, and it is not land; rather, it established a plan for a future developer that provides them a framework within which they may think about a particular development. This is a guideline and establishes a plan in an effort to highlight some of the things the City is trying to th Mr. Riverblood confirmed that is the case. He noted that April 26 is open for Mr. Nathe to meet with himself and the Community Development Director. Additionally, the next step for this part of the Comp Plan process is a presentation before the Planning Commission and City th Council in May. Those are additional opportunities to express concern in addition to April 26, as well as during the six months of peer community review. Mr. Nathe stated Alpaca Estates has no park. It was put it in the 70s, but he should not be held accountable for having a park in his land, when he could have river lots. Residents could have docks on the river. There is a sandy beach, which would be available to all those who live there. Right now, it is used as farm ground. The trees that are left down there are not that great, which is not ideal for a park. Commissioner Sis asked about the route of the proposed bridge. Park and Recreation Commission/April 12, 2018 Page 3 of 7