Laserfiche WebLink
To: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director <br />From: PeggySue Imihy, Planning Intern <br />Re: Home Occupations Ordinance <br />Date: 05-08-18 <br />City of V-/: <br />RAMSEY <br />Under staff direction from the City Council, a review and comparison of neighboring towns and their <br />ordinances for home occupations, also known as home based businesses has been completed. This <br />review specifically examines the number of employees, allowable outdoor storage and number of <br />allowable vehicles on the property. <br />The current City of Ramsey Home Occupation Ordinance (Section 112-351) classifies employees as <br />persons, including but is not limited to co -owners, partners, and employees, which do not live in the <br />dwelling unit on the property but conduct work on the property. <br />The owner of a home occupation on a parcel less than three acres in size may an:4314 a maximum of <br />one person that does not reside in the dwelling unit on the property but does rinduct work on the <br />property. The owner of a home occupation on a parcel three acres or v°a'_r in size may employ a <br />maximum of three persons that do not reside in the dwelling unit on the property but do conduct <br />work on the property. <br />In terms of an accessory building within which the business an oLerate, home occupations are allowed <br />in accessory buildings if the buildings meet the requirements Li- Section 117-349. Exterior storage is not <br />allowed with the exception of one motor vehicle affiliat9: 1,::tli the home occupation and one piece of <br />commercial equipment affiliated with the home occuRgt.'on, per Section 117-355. <br />In situations where those operating a home occ,, a ie: i cannot meet the requirements of Section 117- <br />351, residents can apply for a conditional use he, mic in accordance with Section 117-51. <br />Several neighboring cities have ordinances re:tricting the number of employees who are allowed to <br />work in a home occupation, as well as r:.,trictions on exterior storage and accessory building use. Of the <br />nine comparison cities, most cities 'lave more restrictive regulations on number of employees. <br />Seven of the nine cities do not aI ow exterior/outdoor storage for home occupations. The City of Dayton <br />allows outdoor storage if tbe I ome occupation is on a lot larger than 2.5 acres and if the storage is <br />screened from right-of-viay. 1-he City of Andover has industry -specific limitations for outdoor storage, <br />but requires lots mum, at le.ger than 3 acres, with accessory building or outdoor storage not to exceed <br />800 square feet. <br />Staff recommends a revisiting of the Home Occupation Ordinance to better align with neighboring <br />communities, as well as preserve the residential characteristics of Ramsey neighborhoods. <br />