Agenda - Council - 06/12/2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Motion carried. Voting Yes: Acting Mayor LeTourneau, Councilmembers Kuzma, Johns, Riley, and Shryock. Voting No: None. Motion by Councilmember Riley, seconded by Councilmember Johns, to waive the City Charter requirement to read the ordinance aloud and Adopt Ordinance #18-101 Vacating Right of Way on Outlot Q, Ramsey Town Center Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota. A roll call vote was performed by the Recording Secretary: Councilmember Shryock aye Councilmember Riley aye Councilmember Johns aye Councilmember Kuzma aye Acting Mayor LeTourneau aye Motion carried. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 7.01: Consider Adopting Resolution #18-097 to Approve a Private Kennel License for the Property Located at 15310 Iguana St NW (Project No. 18-116); Case of Tracianna and Duane Prather Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation to adopt Resolution #18-097 granting a private kennel license to specifically maintain the six dogs indicated on the application. He noted that this would ensure that the private kennel license is, in fact, temporary. He noted that there have been no nuisance complaints of any sort on the property. He advised that h there is fencing that fully encloses the side/rear yard and there is also vegetative screening in place. Councilmember Riley stated that this was mentioned to be temporary but there is not a definition of temporary. Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the intent is temporary, but a timeline was not identified. He noted that if the Council desired, a timeline could be put in place. Councilmember Kuzma asked if the dogs would be inside or in outside kennels. Tracianna Prather, 15310 Iguana St NW, replied that these are inside dogs. She stated that three of the dogs are small, while three are bigger. She stated that all the dogs would have kennels inside the home. She stated that the yard is fenced, and they would be adding additional fencing to limit the space of the yard where the dogs can be, to limit the impact on neighbors. Councilmember Kuzma stated that he does have concern with barking and suggested doing this as a trial to see how it goes. He noted that if there are no issues it could simply continue. City Council / May 22, 2018 Page 5 of 11