My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2018
>
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:53:28 PM
Creation date
7/27/2018 8:53:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/26/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
379
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Administrator Ulrich confirmed that would be the other option and is what the City <br />attempted about five years ago. He stated that WSB has a fair amount of expertise in this area <br />and recognize the sensitivity of how a City works. <br />Acting Mayor LeTourneau asked for input on whether or not to condense the timeframe from six <br />to eight months to four months in order to time with the election. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that if the City started now getting the communications out, four <br />months should be sufficient time and would give residents the opportunity to vote yay or nay. <br />He stated that would provide the Council with direction on how to proceed with assessments or <br />the benefit or not having assessments. He stated that he would like to see the question on the <br />ballot. <br />Councilmember Johns asked if this would go towards the direction of the ballot. <br />Acting Mayor LeTourneau stated that was not the direction until that comment was made. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that if the City continued and stayed on a heavy course, the City <br />could be in the position to put this on the ballot. She noted that the information would need to <br />remain heavy and consistent. She stated that is a big -ticket item but recognized that the cost is <br />not large in comparison to the cost for the issuance of debt. She stated that it would have value <br />to have the expertise for public meetings but perhaps the new communications staff member <br />could complete the flyers and informational mailings, if time allowed. <br />Councilmember Johns stated that currently the City does not have a communications member <br />and is actually down multiple staff members and therefore would support having that expertise. <br />She stated that whether or not the Council chooses to go to ballot, the communications piece is <br />vital. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the communications staff member will be coming on board <br />and does have expertise with writing newsletter articles. He explained that WSB has a really <br />complete knowledge of the financing piece and has the experience in how to best communicate <br />that information and engage the public. He stated that perhaps the cost could be negotiated a bit, <br />using City staff for some portions. <br />Councilmember Shryock agreed that perhaps it would be a good combination of the knowledge <br />from WSB combined with some of the leg work that could be done by City staff, which could <br />possibly lower the ultimate cost. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that in a four -month timeframe that would be <br />difficult as there are three large vacancies in staff currently. He stated that in his experience, <br />taking items out of a contract to be done in-house sometimes costs more in efficiency and time. <br />Acting Mayor LeTourneau stated that the communications piece is important for this process and <br />it will be important to provide the best opportunity for residents to learn about alternatives. He <br />stated that whether the message could be communicated in four, six or eight months has not yet <br />City Council Work Session / June 12, 2018 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.