Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 06/26/2018 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Future Land Use Options for 6021 and 6043 Highway 10 NW <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The Owner of these two parcels has requested an opportunity to discuss his future plans for this property with the <br />City Council. Before the Owner invests in rehabbing the building and the site, he desires to better understand the <br />City Council's Strategic Goal to "Improve the Image of Highway 10 [and other key corridors and nodes]". <br />Note: nothing in this case should be interpreted as the City is considering any financial assistance or code <br />enforcement measures on this property. The intent of this case is to simply open up a dialogue with the Owner. <br />Staff is not recommending any of the alternatives at this point without further direction from the City Council. <br />Staff has been working with the Owner for the past 12-18 months on multiple nuisance code violations (paving <br />surface, inoperable vehicles, general blight, permitted uses, etc.). Before the City authorizes any investment in the <br />Property, Staff desires to better understand if the City Council wants to consider a broader redevelopment approach. <br />Staff is concerned that by simply improving existing buildings and site conditions, a broader underlying issue is not <br />being addressed. Many of the buildings are increasing in age and not fully designed for current users. This has led <br />to a series of users that have presented multiple conflicts with the City's Zoning Code. Staff believes that part of <br />this concern can be addressed, but is somewhat confident that ongoing nuisance and blight concerns will remain to <br />a certain degree. <br />The City Council could consider the following broad options. If the City Council desired to explore these options in <br />more detail, Staff would bring back a more detailed analysis, including potent al costs and sources of funding. <br />No Involvement <br />Status Quo <br />Joint Venture <br />Partial <br />Acquisition <br />Joint <br />Venture <br />City <br />Financial <br />Assitance <br />Full City <br />Acquistion <br />Benefits <br />Limited Visual <br />Improvement <br />Improved Visual <br />Improved <br />Visual <br />Highest Visual <br />Improvement <br />Costs <br />Lowest Cost <br />Option <br />Moderate Costs <br />Moderate <br />Costs <br />Highest City <br />Cost <br />Risk <br />Lowest City <br />Risk <br />Moderate/High <br />City Risk <br />Moderate <br />City Risk <br />Highest City <br />Risk <br />The purpose of the case this evening is to provide high level direction on these options. This is the opportunity to <br />take any of the options off the table so that Staff can continue to work with the Owner to clean up the property. <br />Again, nothing in this case should be interpreted as the City is considering any financial expense related to this <br />discussion. <br />Timeframe: <br />30 Minutes <br />