Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Bauer suggested staff amend the text to address the number of employees that would <br /> be allowed if a site is over three acres, while also addressing the number of employees that could <br /> be allowed under three acres through a CUP. He questioned if the City had an accurate number of <br /> home occupations currently operating in Ramsey. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated he would have to run some analysis and could <br /> provide this information to the Commission in August. <br /> Commissioner Woestehoff commented the existing home occupations would not be impacted,but <br /> rather the Commission should be focused on how future home occupations should operate in the <br /> City. <br /> Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to close the public <br /> hearing. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners VanScoy, Anderson, Gengler, <br /> Onyambu, Surma, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 8:50 p.m. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Surma,to postpone action in this <br /> item to the August 2, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, Surma, Gengler, <br /> Onyambu, and VanScoy. Voting No: Woestehoff. Absent: None. <br /> 5.03: Public Hearing: Consider Ordinance#18-13; Amendment to City Code Chapter 117 <br /> (Zoning and Subdivision of Land) to add a Neighborhood Business District <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 8:51 p.m. <br /> Presentation <br /> Planning Intern Imihy presented the staff report stating in 2016, following the Public Hearing <br /> regarding the property located at 6139 157th Lane NW, staff was instructed to create a new zoning <br /> district within the City of Ramsey for the purposes of commercial property located near or adjacent <br /> to residential properties. Primarily, this Zoning District is needed to correct a previous zoning <br /> action(improper use of a conditional use permit). <br /> Planning Intern Imihy explained this zoning district did not move forward in 2016 and staff has <br /> been directed to bring the case back to the Planning Commission as a discussion item. This <br /> proposed zoning district is slightly more restrictive than the current B-1 district and would not <br /> Planning Commission/July 12,2018 <br /> Page 8 of 10 <br />