My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/12/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/12/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:31:20 AM
Creation date
8/23/2018 4:33:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/12/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 10, 2018 I Volume 12 I Issue 11 Zoning Bulletin <br />legally rezoned" the Site "[b]ecause, almost immediately after adopting a new <br />comprehensive zoning ordinance and map in 2014, the City sought to change <br />the zoning of the proposed Costco site to allow numerous prohibited uses, and <br />. . . those additional uses effectively transformed the [Site] from a C-2 district <br />to a C-3 district . . .." <br />The Residents had also argued that the 2016 zoning amendment was pri- <br />marily for the private interest of Costco so that it could build on the Site, and <br />therefore constituted impermissible spot -zoning. Looking at the City Zoning <br />Ordinance's guidelines for amendments to zoning ordinance text, the court <br />found that under those guidelines, a rezoning would be considered illegal <br />spot -zoning "if the proposed amendment is for a small parcel of land singled <br />out for special and privileged treatment." Here, the court found that the 2016 <br />zoning amendment was "created and . . . focused solely on Costco and its <br />activities." Because the City "engaged in illegal spot -zoning by singling out a <br />parcel of land for special and privileged treatment," the court found that the <br />April 2016 zoning amendment was "arbitrary, capricious, and unsupported by <br />substantial evidence." <br />See also: Modak-Truran v. Johnson, 18 So. 3d 206 (Miss. 2009). <br />Variance —Board of Zoning <br />Adjustment grants variance for <br />church addition based on <br />"exceptional condition" in that <br />building structure contributed to <br />local historic district <br />Neighbors argue contributing nature of structure is not <br />sufficient to constitute "exceptional condition" warranting <br />a variance <br />Citation: Dupont Circle Citizens Association v. District of Columbia Board <br />of Zoning Adjustment, 2018 WL 1748313 (D.C. 2018) <br />DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (04/12/18)—This case addressed the issue of <br />whether the presence on property of a structure that contributes to a historic <br />district constitutes an "exceptional condition" justifying a zoning variance. <br />The Background/Facts: St. Thomas' Episcopal Parish (the "Parish") has <br />occupied its current site in the District of Columbia ("D.C.") for 120 years. In <br />1970, the main church was destroyed by fire. Since that time, the church has <br />operated out of the only remaining structure on the property —the Parish Hall. <br />In September 2015, the Parish proposed to build an addition to the Parish <br />Hall. Although one building would remain, its western side would include a <br />four-story church element, and its eastern side would include a multifamily <br />4 ©2018 Thomson Reuters <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.