My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/12/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/12/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:31:20 AM
Creation date
8/23/2018 4:33:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/12/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NORFOLK'S RESILIENT POINT SYSTEM FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT <br />Resilient Development Activity for Risk Reduction <br />Points Earned <br />smel <br />Construct building to meet uo-mile wind -load design requirements of <br />the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code <br />Elevate the ground -story finished floor and all significant electrical <br />and mechanical equipment no less than three feet above highest <br />adjacent grade <br />Construct an impact -resistant (hail, tree damage) roof <br />Install impact- (hurricane or wind) resistant windows <br />Install operable storm shutters <br />Establish operating procedures for how the project will handle loss <br />of off -site or grid power, transition to a backup source of power, and <br />transition back to normal operation <br />A hallmark of the recent code revision is <br />the "Resilience Quotient" concept, a point - <br />based system that requires risk mitigation, <br />sustainable energy, and stormwater man- <br />agement measures for all new development <br />(§5.12). Each new proposed development <br />may elect to undergo evaluation for inclusion <br />of these considerations during the site plan <br />review process or to forego that portion of <br />the review process and select from a menu of <br />specific interventions. Each proposed devel- <br />opment is required to have a certain number <br />of points, ranging from four points for one - <br />to five -unit developments, to io points for <br />large multifamily development. With regard <br />to flood risk mitigation, the menu options <br />include elevating mechanical systems, <br />on -site stormwater retention, and the instal- <br />lation of permeable surfaces. <br />Norfolk has also developed a series of <br />zoning map overlays that serve to classify <br />local flood risk citywide andprescribe spe- <br />cific interventions for each overlay. <br />• Coastal Resilience Overlays are applied to <br />areas with the highest flood risk (§3.9.18). <br />These areas require higher elevations of <br />the first floor, limit parking and hard pave- <br />ment, and require additional landscaping <br />and open space. <br />• Upland Resilience Overlays are applied <br />to lower -risk areas that are more capable <br />of accommodating growth (§3.9.19). New <br />construction within an Upland Resilience <br />Overlay is also permitted to reduce its <br />own resilience requirements in exchange <br />for placing conservation easements on <br />higher -risk properties. <br />• Neighborhood Resilience Overlays are <br />also lower -risk areas, and are intended <br />NEW YORK CITY <br />New York City —fresh off a multiyear post - <br />Hurricane Sandy planning effort —has taken <br />an approach similar to Norfolk, though on <br />a decidedly larger scale. Given the diverse <br />local building stock and its unique vulner- <br />ability to catastrophic coastal flooding and <br />sea -level rise, the city's efforts are wide <br />ranging and comprehensive from a zoning <br />and land -use perspective. <br />In "High and Dry on the Waterfront," <br />Schwab described New York's initial post - <br />Sandy flood zoning measures to ease the <br />structural flood mitigations and ensure <br />that these mitigations weren't disruptive to <br />the existing urban fabric. These measures <br />largely mirrored Mandeville's approach; that <br />is, explicit zoning relief to permit elevation <br />(or dry floodproofing) and design guidelines <br />to screen and integrate newly elevated prop- <br />erties into the streetscape. <br />Soon after the publication of that article, <br />the city engaged in a community -based, <br />five -borough planning effort led by the <br />Department of City Planning (DCP) to take <br />these initial measures several steps further. <br />The Resilient Neighborhoods Initiative, as it <br />later came to be known, identified communi- <br />ties in all five boroughs that had been hit <br />particularly hard by Hurricane Sandy. They <br />would be subject to FEMA's new Advisory <br />2.00 <br />too plus o.5o per <br />ft. above 3 ft. <br />0.50 <br />0.50 <br />0.50 <br />0.50 <br />for more typical cases. They allow for <br />customized design standards that <br />are appropriate to the local context <br />(§3.9.16). <br />Norfolk's multifaceted approach of <br />utilizing the zoning code to not only encour- <br />age but require flood -resilient development <br />is likely a harbinger of things to come for <br />coastal municipalities. Norfolk's model <br />proves a way forward for medium-sized <br />coastal cities looking to turn coastal adap- <br />tation and resilience goals identified in a <br />climate adaptation or comprehensive plan <br />into zoning reality. <br />y,,;ATte <br />r Attached buildings in` coastal neighborhoods pose a series of retrofitting <br />challenges, particularly in the context of mandatory flood insurance and <br />revised flood insurance rate maps. <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 6.18 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.