My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/28/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2018
>
Agenda - Council - 08/28/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:55:13 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 8:21:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/28/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
816
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Gladhill stated the property was currently zoned R-1 MUSA. <br />He clarified the size of lots that would be allowed today noting the minimum was .25 acres or 80 <br />feet in width. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff asked how large the bright yellow parcel was in size. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained the parcel was approximately 38 acres in <br />size. <br />Ms. Clark requested the City keep both parcels R-1 and not have a portion R-1 and the remainder <br />zoned R-2. She believed that the R-1 zoning was more fitting given the fact her neighborhood had <br />a rural feel. <br />Joe Field, 8021 152nd Lane NW, stated he believed one of the appeals of Ramsey was its rural look <br />and feel. He anticipated this drew people to the community. He feared that highly dense <br />neighborhoods such as the one being proposed would take away from this attraction. He <br />encouraged the City to keep these parcels zoned R-1. <br />Jan Brock, 15250 Kangaroo Street, stated she abutted the proposed property. She explained she <br />has lived on her property since 1974 and stated she would have a hard time if the property behind <br />her home were to develop in a less than .25-acre manner. She questioned what happened to the <br />previous plans for this property and encouraged the City to keep in mind the desires of the adjacent <br />property owners who bought into the rural look and feel. She encouraged the City consider how <br />to provide a better buffer or transition from the existing homes to the new proposed homes. <br />Al Roessler, applicant, discussed the reasons why he made his request to the City of Ramsey. He <br />explained all cities were reviewing their comprehensive plans at this time which led him to believe <br />now was the appropriate time to make the request. He commented the driving factor for this <br />request was Capstone's parcel on the west side. He described the proposed design for the new <br />development and indicated there would be buffer zone the size of a football field in between the <br />existing homes and the medium density homes. <br />Vice Chairperson VanScoy commented the transitioning between the existing homes and the new <br />development would be a major concern no matter what the zoning was changed to. <br />Mr. Roessler explained he would meet all City's buffering requirements. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented further on the City's buffering <br />requirements and how this applied to new developments that abutted larger lot acreage. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff requested further information on the high -density development across <br />the street. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the layout of this development with the <br />Commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.