My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:40:16 PM
Creation date
2/7/2005 7:58:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/08/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
436
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Elvig inquired about the size of the units. <br /> <br />Mr. Strandlund replied the units will be ramblers with 1,500 to 1,600 square feet on the main <br />level with finished basements. <br /> <br />Dave Johnson, 15423 Potassium Street, questioned when Potassium Street was determined to be <br />a public road. ' <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied the City has maintained the road for some time. He indicated he <br />will provide Mr. Johnson with his research on the road. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated he does not believe PotaSsium Street is a public street. Also, he feels <br />Potassium Street should be moved to be right dOwn the property line. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson asked if there is a City ordinance that requires all roads in the City to be <br />centered on the property line. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied it is typical in the City to center the roads, but it is <br />not required by ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated this development would include 52 units and half of the traffic would be <br />coming down Potassium Street, as Well as the 22 units next to him. He stated the traffic should <br />be routed on CR 5 some other way. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied one of the problems would be getting the county to grant access to CR 5, <br />however, Mr. Johnson's comments will be revieWed. <br /> <br />Patrick Hampton, 15551 Potassium Street, stated he will be right across the street from this <br />abomination if it goes in. His father spent the money putting Potassium Street in. If he recalls, <br />after the City maintains a road for seven years it becomes a public road, however, in the 80's his <br />father repeatedly asked the City not to maintain the road. The City continued to maintain the <br />road and is now saying they own the road. He stated their property line is 30 feet from the road <br />and now more of their property will be taken. He thinks the road should be centered on the <br />property line. Also, after these developers are long gone and have made their money, someone <br />will say this road cannot handle the volume and assess the property owners to widen the road. <br />He stated he is not opposed to the builders developing their property, but this development is <br />pretty high density. His final point is if this development is built as it is presented it will <br />substantially reduce the resale of his property because of the high density housing next to it. The <br />landowners will have to live with the consequences of the builder's actions. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig asked if Mr. HamptOn is against the road being public and paved if it is <br />centered. <br /> <br />City Council/January 25, 2005 <br /> Page 7 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.