My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 06/14/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2018
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 06/14/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:28:18 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 4:24:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
06/14/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that would be a costly request. He stated that the existing access would need to be demolished as <br />the City could not allow that many access points within that short distance. <br />Mr. Pankratz stated that Coborn's does not own that outlot, the developer of that shopping center <br />owns that outlot and therefore three parties would be combined into that agreement. <br />Planning Commissioner Woestehoff asked if semis would access the building from the south <br />side and asked if there would be concerns with having that type of traffic near the entrance to the <br />store. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that turning radius exhibits would need to be <br />provided during future review. He stated that type of scenario is not uncommon. <br />Planning Commissioner Woestehoff asked if having two grocery type retailers would dilute the <br />chances that a retailer like Target would come in the future. <br />Mr Pankratz used the example of Elk River and Coon Rapids in which there are multiple grocers <br />and mass retailers in one location. <br />Planning Commissioner Woestehoff stated that Elk River and Coon Rapids have a lot more retail <br />space than Ramsey and perhaps a retailer like Target would not come if there are already two <br />grocers. <br />Mr. Pankratz replied that the retailers all feed off each other because they provide different <br />specialties. He stated that a Target, Walmart or Petco often look for retailers that draw attention <br />to a corridor as a benefit to generate more customers. He stated that if those businesses are <br />successful, that often draws in the bigger retailers. <br />EDA Member Kanaventi stressed the importance of allowing competition. He stated that if they <br />are hoping to develop Ramsey into a force, competition will attract business rather than divert. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that she is concerned with Coborn's staying in the community as <br />they have been great partners. She stated that she also believes that Aldi is a different store and <br />serves a different customer and therefore that could be filling a need that the community is <br />currently not addressing. <br />Planning Commissioner Bauer stated that when they met with Coborn's, he explained that the <br />bulk of his shopping is done at Coborn's, but they sometimes go to Aldi for something that is on <br />special. He stated that Aldi does not have everything and therefore customers have to go to <br />another store in fill in the rest of their shopping needs. He stated that currently Ramsey residents <br />are going to Coon Rapids to shop at Aldi. He stated that the more things that will draw traffic to <br />The COR, the easier it will be to facilitate conversations with other retailers. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that the City has been told by its experts that Ramsey is most <br />likely not going to get a big box retailer. He stated that Aldi is a destination store and therefore <br />would seem to be a good fit. <br />City Council Work Session / May 23, 2018 <br />Page 4 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.