My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 06/14/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2018
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 06/14/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:28:18 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 4:24:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
06/14/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr Pankratz stated that it is a wrought iron fence with landscaping. <br />Planning Commissioner Van Scoy stated that the walls are a direct conflict with the idea of being <br />open to pedestrians and therefore he would not support that component. <br />Planning Commissioner Anderson referenced the parkway concept, which is flexible. He stated <br />that while he does not favor gated communities within The COR, he could support that if the <br />bike system is connected. <br />Planning Commissioner Surma referenced a concept that gained consensus in the past. He noted <br />that if this is followed, a restaurant will come into the site that Aldi wants. <br />City Administrator Ulrich asked if there are comments to expanding the residential area as <br />opposed to keeping that retail, specifically the northern 20 acres north of Ramsey Parkway. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that residents were sold the idea that they were getting places to eat, <br />and shop and the City has been slow to keep that promise. <br />Planning Commissioner Surma noted that this is one of the two concepts that was agreed upon <br />and that space that Aldi wants is reserved and could be promoted as an ideal space for a <br />restaurant. <br />Planning Commissioner Anderson stated that this is a concept but believed that the previous <br />concept is more of what was agreed upon with retail in the northwest corner that would have <br />road access. He stated that would open up residential as well in the area that is not high visibility <br />from the road. <br />Councilmember Riley stressed flexibility with what the market is asking for. He stated that the <br />concept referenced by Planning Commissioner Anderson would be half and half between retail <br />and residential. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that staff has enough to continue discussions. <br />He confirmed the consensus that the group would be open to allowing additional residential in <br />that area. <br />EDA Member Steffen stated that although the concept is great, there is not a developer proposing <br />that use. He stated that he is surprised that people would want to push a developer to purchase <br />land from another land owner. <br />Mr. Pankratz stated that this land is not zoned residential and there are a lot of developer groups <br />that do not want to go through rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment processes. He <br />stated that knowing that the City would be open to residential would open up additional interest. <br />2.04: Concept Proposal: 6,100 Square Foot Automotive Repair Center <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama reviewed the staff report. <br />City Council Work Session / May 23, 2018 <br />Page 11 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.