Laserfiche WebLink
City Planner Anderson asked if there are any items that the Board feels have been left out of the <br />planning cycle for the next 10 years. <br />Board Member Valentine noted the changing retail market and stated that will continue to be a <br />changing market that will have a huge effect on commercial development because of the <br />continuing trend for buyers to purchase goods online. He noted that although it is hard to predict <br />what will happen in that market, that has been a part of the discussions in updating the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />5.02: Review Draft Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area Chapter of Comprehensive <br />Plan <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the purpose of this case is to <br />review a draft of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />He advised that staff will continue to refine the chapter but wanted to provide the Board with an <br />opportunity to review and comment prior to the public open house on April 9tn <br />Chairperson Stodola asked if this section would fall under the same recommendation as the <br />previous chapter, regarding the possibility of adding language to require updating documents. <br />City Planner Anderson commented that the natural resources inventory would include all parts of <br />the City, including the corridor, and therefore he did not feel that the language would be necessary <br />in this chapter. He stated that if it is the preference of the Board, the language could be added to <br />this chapter. <br />Chairperson Stodola agreed that the language to be included in the last chapter would be sufficient <br />to address all applicable areas. <br />Board Member Valentine stated that it could be helpful to have a brief statement to the same nature <br />for this chapter. <br />Board Member Hiatt commented that it could be helpful to have updated information for specific <br />items that would apply to this area, such as soil erosion. He noted that there may be possibilities <br />for adding funding partners for this area because of the shared resource. He explained that if the <br />City can stress that they would like to have updated data, to the extent possible, it could help to <br />possibly gain assistance from the other partners that have an interest in this corridor. <br />City Planner Anderson agreed that perhaps that would open a door for potential grant funds to <br />accomplish that data collection work in this specific corridor and perhaps adding that statement to <br />this section would make more sense than he originally thought. <br />Board Member Anderson referenced the statement regarding a positive learning environment and <br />asked if there are methods that will be used to attempt to communicate this information and get <br />people interested. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that through the Resilient Communities Partnership, staff is <br />working with an adult education course on organics recycling. He stated that group is helping to <br />develop an outline on how best to communicate and educate the community on that topic. He <br />Environmental Policy Board / March 19, 2018 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />