Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Policy Board (EPB) 5. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 07/16/2018 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Landscape Plan for Sterling Trophy Site Plan (Project No. 18-125) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Sterling Trophy is working with the City on the potential purchase of the property located at 6710 Highway 10 NW <br />(the "Subject Property"). They have submitted a Site Plan for the construction of a 4,000 square foot retail building <br />for their business operation on the Subject Property. Their Site Plan submittal includes a Landscape Plan for review. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Subject Property does not appear to include any wetlands or floodplains. Furthermore, there appears to only be <br />three (3) significant trees on the Subject Property, two of which will be preserved. The MLCCS identifies the <br />Subject Property as being Urban with Vegetative Cover. The City's NRI did not indicate any significant natural <br />features on the Subject Property. <br />The Subject Property is located within the B-2 Highway Business District. The landscaping requirements of the B-2 <br />District are based on either the building footprint (1 tree per 1,000 sq. ft.) or site perimeter (1 tree per every 50 <br />lineal feet), whichever is greater. Also, for every ten (10) parking stalls, an additional tree is required. The Subject <br />Property is surrounded by parcels also zoned B-2 Highway Business or H-1 Highway 10 Business District (on north <br />side of Highway 10). There is no bufferyard requirements for this project. <br />Staff is generally supportive of the Landscaping Plan with revisions outlined in the Staff Review Letter. Most <br />notably, the proposed landscaping needs to be increased not only to comply with minimum planting requirements <br />but also to incorporate evergreen trees (should contain no less than 25% evergreens and there are none included in <br />the current plan). Also, notes need to be added to the plan sheet to call out the topsoil requirement as well. Finally, <br />it appears that seed, rather than sod, is being proposed for the southern half of the Subject Property, which does <br />require approval by the City Council. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br />Action: <br />Motion to recommend approval of the Landscape Plan contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. <br />Site Location Map <br />Landscape Plan <br />Staff Review Letter <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox <br />Reviewed By Date <br />