Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Bauer suggested staff amend the text to address the number of employees that would <br />be allowed if a site is over three acres, while also addressing the number of employees that could <br />be allowed under three acres through a CUP. He questioned if the City had an accurate number of <br />home occupations currently operating in Ramsey. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated he would have to run some analysis and could <br />provide this information to the Commission in August. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff commented the existing home occupations would not be impacted, but <br />rather the Commission should be focused on how future home occupations should operate in the <br />City. <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners VanScoy, Anderson, Gengler, <br />Onyambu, Surma, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 8:50 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Surma, to postpone action in this <br />item to the August 2, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, Surma, Gengler, <br />Onyambu, and VanScoy. Voting No: Woestehoff. Absent: None. <br />5.03: Public Hearing: Consider Ordinance #18-13; Amendment to City Code Chapter 117 <br />(Zoning and Subdivision of Land) to add a Neighborhood Business District <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 8:51 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Planning Intern Imihy presented the staff report stating in 2016, following the Public Hearing <br />regarding the property located at 6139 157th Lane NW, staff was instructed to create a new zoning <br />district within the City of Ramsey for the purposes of commercial property located near or adjacent <br />to residential properties. Primarily, this Zoning District is needed to correct a previous zoning <br />action (improper use of a conditional use permit). <br />Planning Intern Imihy explained this zoning district did not move forward in 2016 and staff has <br />been directed to bring the case back to the Planning Commission as a discussion item. This <br />proposed zoning district is slightly more restrictive than the current B-1 district and would not <br />Planning Commission/July 12, 2018 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />