Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission <br />Meeting Date: 08/02/2018 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />6. 2. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Request from AKM Farms for Revision to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to discuss a request from AKM Farms (Paxmar) to revise the current draft of the <br />Comprehensive Plan Update to change the future/planned land use of two parcels. This case is for discussion only. <br />The City will have until December of this year to make modifications to the current draft. <br />Notification: <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The request involves to sites in close proximity. <br />• Northfork Parcel (western parcel) <br />• Alpha Development Parcel (eastern parcel) <br />Northfork Parcel <br />This site is currently guided as Rural Developing. The site is assumed to be part of the original Northfork Planned <br />Unit Development, although records reflect this in different capacities over the years. Nonetheless, this site is not <br />located in the future urban service area, at the request of the previous land owner. The area is guided for lot of at <br />least 1 acre on private well and septic. Previous feedback from area neighbors is that the density lower than the <br />adjacent development provides transition to the Northfork neighborhood, which is larger lots on private well and <br />septic. <br />The current owner purchased the property in 2017 and would like to extend municipal water supply and sanitary <br />sewer. There was a previous development proposal submitted that included a public workshop and Planning <br />Commission review. The request was ultimately denied. Any change to the planned land use for this site is a policy <br />decision for the Planning Commission and City Council. From a technical perspective, this can be accomplished. <br />Staff believes there is merit for at least extending the future urban service area. The Owner is requesting a future <br />land use of medium density (detached), which would net approximately 100 households. Based on previous review, <br />Staff believes a compromise could be considered. <br />Northfork Parcel Alternatives: <br />• Low Density Residential <br />• Medium Density Residential <br />• Mix of Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential <br />• No Change - Leave as Rural Lots <br />Alpha Development Parcel <br />The Owner, previously under the name as Paxmar, LLC, pitched a similar project in 2017 that was denied by the <br />City Council. That development proposal included a mix of medium density (detached) and low density residential. <br />The primary objection was density transitioning, and a slight deviation to minimum requirements. Additionally, a <br />majority of the City Council felt that it was appropriate to leave this parcel guided as Low Density Residential, <br />given it's direct proximity to adjacent rural lots. <br />Assuming that there are not requests to deviate from density transitioning requirements, Staff could support a <br />