My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/02/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/02/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:31:31 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 3:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/02/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
North Dayton Development AUAR <br />incompatibility of surrounding land uses include: <br />■ Select wetlands on the project site will be maintained. <br />• Wetland impacts, when unavoidable to accommodate the proposed development, shall require <br />mitigation as required at the time of application. <br />• Disturbed areas shall be stabilized and protected as soon as possible following disturbances, and <br />facilities will be implemented to retain sediment on the site. <br />• Building design shall include the following features or characteristics to offset the proposed building <br />heights and potential visual impacts: <br />- Building are to be constructed utilizing high quality materials and architectural design; <br />- Lighting must be down directional; <br />- A high quality landscaping plan will be submitted to provide additional <br />generally beautify the project throughout. <br />10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms <br />screening to the north and <br />a. Geology — Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible <br />geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst <br />conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have <br />on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic <br />features. <br />According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, surficial deposits beneath the study area consist <br />primarily of loamy till. Franconia bedrock is located below the surficial deposits across most of the site <br />The majority of the study area is noted to have a low sensitivity to groundwater from pollution. <br />According to the Minnesota Karst Inventory dataset, no sinkholes, seeps, or springs are identified within <br />the study area. The closest instance of Karst conditions is 6.19 miles northeast of the study area. <br />b. Soils and topography — Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and <br />descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to <br />erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. <br />Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project <br />activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. <br />Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, <br />soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be <br />addressed in response to the stormwater "water resources" question. <br />For an AUAR, the number of acres to be graded and number of cubic yards of soil to be moved need not <br />be given; instead, a general discussion of the likely earthmoving needs for development of the area should <br />be given, with an emphasis on unusual or problem areas. In discussing mitigation measures, both the <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.