My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/10/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2018
>
Agenda - Council - 07/10/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:53:50 PM
Creation date
9/11/2018 3:54:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/10/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
486
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
another year based off the previous approval. He stated that the safety issue from Alpine Drive <br />pedestrian crossing would not be closed. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that he was not part of the original discussion for Preliminary Plat <br />and noted that it would not hurt for a motion to include extension of the Preliminary Plat for <br />another year. <br />Acting Mayor LeTourneau stated that however the Council moves forward that extension could <br />be given. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that the Council is not going to let the Preliminary Plat expire <br />and hoped that took some anxiety from Capstone. She stated that the Council has consensus <br />with the proposed Preliminary Plat in front of the Council with the pedestrian crossing details. <br />She stated that there is not consensus to require the utility extension and may be okay with <br />allowing negotiations between the two parties (Capstone and AKM) to determine whether or not <br />that utility extension moves forward. She stated that the possible changes in the future, <br />regarding utility extensions, would be up to Capstone. <br />Mr. Bona stated that he appreciates the comments from Councilmember Shryock. He explained <br />that if the utility extension is required, Capstone would lose leverage to gain compensation from <br />the other party to gain market value for the lost lots. He stated that after the Planning <br />Commission, the owner of Capstone approached the neighboring property owner to explain that <br />they would be open to possible utility extension if a proposal/compensation is provided. <br />Kent Roessler, AKM Farms, stated that AKM does not have an opposition to the City approving <br />the Preliminary Plat but wants to ensure that this development and future development goes in <br />the direction the City desires. He identified the AKM Farm property, noting that the two AKM <br />properties are equal in size to the Capstone property. He stated that they would like to see the <br />City plan for the future of that area, noting that his 32 acres is probably the most prime land <br />available for development in the City because of the proximity to the golf course. He noted that <br />amenity will bring higher values. He stated that this should be a planning decision from the City <br />itself. He stated that they would like to see the sewer and water extended through the Capstone <br />parcel to the western boundary. He stated that Mr. Bona spoke of entitlement on his property <br />and noted that Capstone simply has a preliminary entitlement and therefore now would be the <br />time for the City to require that connection. He stated that the City requires that activity <br />regardless of whether the neighboring property is within the MUSA. He stated that the City <br />would have the opportunity to capitalize on the development of Outlot C by requiring the utility <br />extension. He requested that the utility extension be required and negotiated by the City and <br />Capstone. He referenced the topic of density transitioning, noting that Capstone's west boundary <br />will have 17 or 18 homes with 50 to 60-foot width lots. He noted that four lots were preliminary <br />platted in that area that would backup to that boundary. He stated that there is no density <br />transitioning proposed. He displayed the original plat for Outlot C, which was preliminary <br />platted in 1985 and included 16 single family homes. He stated that in 1990 a Preliminary Plat <br />was included as part of a master plan and PUD. He stated that it is the position of the City that <br />the Preliminary Plat has expired. He stated that only one Preliminary Plat was ever required for <br />Northfork and therefore based on precedent the entire property can develop as long as it follows <br />City Council / June 26, 2018 <br />Page 9 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.