Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/06/2018

Home

July 10, 2018 I Volume 12 I Issue 13 Zoning Bulletin filing of which in the "office of the board" (i.e., on the publicly avail- able website) triggers the 30 day deadline. Applying that holding to the facts of the case, the court concluded that the Residents' challenge to the ZBA's refusal to revoke the permit was timely "because the unapproved minutes of the December 8, 2016 meeting posted to the Board's website on December 19 [did] not amount to 'the filing of the decision' "—triggering the 30 day period. Rather, that "filing of the decision" occurred on January 6, 2017—the date of the public website posting of the December 22 meeting minutes, which reflected the approval of the December 8 meeting minutes —at which the ZBA voted to refuse to revoke the peanut. On the other hand, the court also concluded that the Residents' challenge to the ZBA's October 13 decision was untimely as the minutes of the October 13 meeting had been posted and approved more than thirty days before the Residents went to court. See also: Aucoin v. City of Mandeville, 552 So. 2d 714 (La. Ct. App. 1st Gil: 1989). See also: Sanchez v. Board of Adjustment for City of San Antonio, 387 S.W.3d 745 (Tex. App. El Paso 2012). See also: Holding v. Franklin County Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 565 N.W.2d 318 (Iowa 1997). Vested or property rights City suspends commercial tenant's building permit, citing material misrepresentations in the permit application Commercial tenant then sues the City, alleging the suspension of its permit violated its procedural due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment Citation: Rockville Cars, LLC v. City of Rockville, Maryland, 891 E3d 141 (4th Gin 2018) The Fourth Circuit has jurisdiction over Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia. FOURTH CIRCUIT (MARYLAND) (05/24/18)—This case ad- 8 © 2018 Thomson Reuters