My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/06/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/06/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:31:37 AM
Creation date
9/14/2018 3:57:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/06/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
360
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin July 25, 2018 I Volume 12 I Issue 14 <br />authorities to circumvent the Building Peanut Rule by enacting restrictive zon- <br />ing regulations on land that is necessary to give the buildings value." (The <br />court found support for its conclusion under the principles advanced in other <br />jurisdictions —namely those that "emphasize that the rights vested by a build- <br />ing permit application are to develop land, not merely build structures.") <br />Applying its holding to the facts here, the court held that because Golden <br />Sands' building permit application included a map that provided "an objective <br />means to determine the contours of the [p]roperty," Golden Sands possessed a <br />vested right to use the property for agricultural purposes. <br />See also: McKee Family I, LLC v. City of Fitchburg, 2017 WI 34, 374 Wis. <br />2d 487, 893 N. W.2d 12 (2017). <br />See also: Manna Funding, LLC v. Kittitas County, 173 Wash. App. 879, 295 <br />P.3d 1197 (Div. 3 2013), as amended on denial of reconsideration, (Apr. 9, <br />2013). <br />Case Note: <br />Wisconsin is in the minority of United States jurisdictions that adheres to the Building <br />Permit Rule. The majority of other jurisdictions require both a building permit and <br />"substantial construction and/or substantial expenditures before rights vest." The <br />court explained that under the majority rule, a landowner's building permit can be <br />revoked if the property is rezoned (even if construction has already begun). <br />Zoning News from Around the <br />Nation <br />HAWAII <br />The Puna County Council Planning Committee has reportedly postponed <br />action until mid -July on vacation rental legislation while the County recovers <br />from its ongoing lava flow emergency. The proposed legislation would pro- <br />hibit un-hosted short-term rentals in residential and agricultural zones, while <br />allowing them in hotel and resort zones as well as commercial districts. Exist- <br />ing rentals in disallowed areas would be able to be grandfathered in by apply- <br />ing for a nonconforming use certificate that must be renewed annually at a <br />cost of $500. One council woman has reportedly proposed adding language to <br />the bill that would allow the County planning director to accept applications <br />for new short-term vacation rentals to replace those lost during an emergency. <br />However, opponents of that proposed amendment argue it is contrary to the <br />original intent of the bill. <br />Source: West Hawaii Today; wwwwesthawaiitoday.com <br />OHIO <br />Governor John Kasich recently signed legislation, which, among other <br />things, contained an amendment that would accelerate an expected referen- <br />© 2018 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.