My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/09/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2018
>
Agenda - Council - 10/09/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:56:31 PM
Creation date
10/12/2018 2:50:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/09/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
429
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Northfork Itasca Shores <br />Northfork Oaks <br />Woodland Green <br />Totals <br />$932.70 <br />$750.80 <br />$1,241.40 <br />J11 <br />11 <br />31 <br />124 <br />$10,259.70 <br />$8,258.80 <br />$38,483.40 <br />$143,531.60 <br />This project has a total of 124 benefiting properties, resulting in a total project assessment amount of $143,531.60. <br />Each property proposed to be assessed has its primary access onto an improved street section. The assessment <br />amounts preliminarily adopted by Council are shown in the attached Feasibility Report. Attached are copies of the <br />final assessment maps and rolls for this project. <br />The City's Special Assessments Policy calls for special assessments to recover 25% of eligible street reconstruction <br />and overlay improvement costs. On this project, all project costs are eligible for assessments. The final assessments <br />as proposed recover 25% of eligible project costs. <br />Special assessments are calculated using methods resulting in reasonable and equitable distribution of assessments <br />that are uniform upon the same class of properties within the assessable area. The test for determining the validity <br />of a special assessment is whether the improvement for which the assessment was levied has increased the market <br />value of the property against which the assessment was levied in at least the amount of the assessment. <br />The City's Special Assessments Policy identifies three optional methods for calculating assessments; adjusted front <br />footage, area, and per lot. Because each assessable property generally received the same benefit from the project <br />improvements in each of the project areas, assessments are proposed to be spread equally among benefiting <br />properties in each project area using the "per lot" method. <br />The proposed final assessments conform to the requirements set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, Chapter 8 <br />of the City Charter, applicable City code, and the City's adopted Special Assessments Policy. Attached are copies <br />of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, the City's adopted Special Assessments Policy, and Chapter 8 of the City <br />Charter that provides additional controls on the use of special assessments for public improvements within the City <br />of Ramsey. <br />Final assessments for this project are proposed to carry a 10-year term at an interest rate of 5.22%. A schedule of <br />payments showing annual payments including principal and interest is included on page 3 of the attached <br />Assessment Hearing Notice. <br />At the time this case was published one deferral request had been received for this project. <br />The Special Benefit Consultation report completed for this project by the firm of Patchin Messner Dodd & Brumm <br />anticipates that benefiting properties will be enhanced in value per project area as follows; <br />Project Area (Development <br />Name) <br />The North Forty 2nd <br />The North Forty 3rd <br />Northfork 2nd & 3rd <br />Northfork <br />Northfork Itasca Shores <br />Northfork Oaks <br />Woodland Green <br />Final Per Lot <br />Assessment <br />$856.50 <br />$1,425.20 <br />$1,395.90 <br />$958.40 <br />$932.70 <br />$750.80 <br />$1,241.40 <br />Minimum <br />Enhanced Value <br />$1,800 <br />1$1,800 <br />$2,000 <br />$2,000 <br />$2,200 <br />$2,200 <br />$1,800 <br />Maximum <br />Enhanced Value <br />$2,000 <br />$2,000 <br />$2,200 <br />$2,200 <br />$2,400 <br />$2,400 <br />$2,000 <br />Since the proposed final assessments are less than the minimum enhanced values in each project area Staff believes <br />the proposed final assessments are defendable. A copy of the Special Benefit Consultation report is not attached to <br />this case but will be available at the Assessment Hearing. <br />Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.