Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the Conditional Use Permit was approved <br /> for a list that is not listed as a conditional use. He stated that the City has agreed to apply a more <br /> appropriate zoning as the existing situation has created problems for financing for the business. <br /> He stated that because the City approved the use, the City is obligated to resolve the situation <br /> that was created. <br /> Mr. Petro stated that it appears that the City's only option is to rezone the parcel or tear down the <br /> building. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that the City's only option would be to <br /> zone the parcel appropriately to support the uses that have been approved. <br /> Acting Mayor LeTourneau noted that the City is attempting to resolve a situation that has already <br /> occurred and uses that have already been approved. <br /> Mr. Petro stated that this property would be worth more money for the business owner as a <br /> business parcel rather than a residential parcel with a Conditional Use Permit. He believed that <br /> the neighboring property owners would be the ones to suffer if a restaurant serving alcohol until <br /> 2:00 a.m. is allowed on the site compared to the daycare which closes at 6:00 p.m. He stated that <br /> he does not mind the daycare use but would not support the additional uses. He believed that <br /> additional structures would be added to the property once the zoning is changed. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the property owner relied on the City <br /> acting in good faith on its own ordinances 20 years ago. He stated that case law has since <br /> changed, and the zoning would need to be changed to list the allowed uses that have already been <br /> approved. He stated that looking at the existing use and previous uses, the site has been used <br /> commercially and the City is simply allowing the correction to the zoning to support uses that <br /> have already been approved and existed on the site. He stated that there is always a potential for <br /> expansion and new uses whether the zoning changes or not and he believed that it would be <br /> better to have the appropriate controls in place prior to receiving any requests. <br /> Councilmember Shryock stated that the Council understands the concerns of the community and <br /> attempts to make decisions based on input from the community. She stated that the Council <br /> would not permit activities that would not be appropriate because of the location. She asked for <br /> clarification on the difference between the neighborhood business district and general business <br /> district. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the intent was to be very restrictive and <br /> selective on the uses. He noted that this would be much more restrictive than the Highway 47 <br /> corridor businesses, which is already more restrictive than the Highway 10 corridor businesses. <br /> He noted that there would be much more protection in this district compared to the other <br /> business districts. <br /> Councilmember Shryock noted that there is no change for the parcel at this time. She stated that, <br /> in the future, perhaps a small café or coffee shop would be considered but did not believe that the <br /> Council would allow a full restaurant on this site. <br /> City Council/August 28,2018 <br /> Page 9 of 23 <br />