My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 10/15/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2018
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 10/15/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 11:03:43 AM
Creation date
10/15/2018 10:38:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
10/15/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21. Traffic <br />For most AUAR reviews, a relatively detailed traffic analysis will be needed, especially if <br />there is to be much commercial development in the AUAR area or if there are major congested <br />roadways in the vicinity. The results of the traffic analysis must be used in the response to Item <br />22 and to the noise aspect of Item 24. Instead of responding to the information called for in the <br />EAW Guidelines for Item 21, the following information should be provided: <br />• Description and map of existing and proposed roadway system (including state, regional <br />and local roads to be affected by the development of the AUAR area. This information <br />will include existing and proposed roadway capacities and existing and projected <br />background traffic volumes. <br />• Trip generation data for each major development scenario broken down by land use <br />zones and/or other relevant subdivisions in the area. The projected distributions onto the <br />roadway system must be included. <br />• Analysis of impacts of the traffic generated by the AUAR area on the roadway system, <br />including: a comparison of peak period total flows to capacities and analysis of Levels of <br />Service and delay times at critical points (if any). <br />• A discussion of structural and non-structural improvements and traffic management <br />measures that are proposed to mitigate problems. <br />NOTE: in the above analyses, the geographical scope must extend outward as far as the traffic <br />to be generated would have a significant effect on the roadway system and traffic measurements, <br />and projections should include peak days and peak hours, or other appropriate measures related <br />to identifying congestion problems, as well as ADTs. <br />Appendix B contains a complete traffic analysis compiled by Meyer, Mohaddes Associates, Inc. <br />for this AUAR. The report entitled Ramsey Town Center Traffic Analysis was completed in <br />March 2003 and is contained in its entirety in the Appendix. <br />Classification Summary <br />The project site is served by a network of principal and minor arterial roadways and local streets <br />as shown in Figure 21.1. Highway 10/169 near the study area is a four -lane divided US Highway <br />that is classified as a Principal Arterial. Ramsey Boulevard (CR 56) and Industry Avenue (CR <br />116) near the study site are two-lane County Roads that are classified as B-Minor Arterials. <br />Armstrong Boulevard (CSAH 83) and Sunfish Lake Boulevard (CSAH 57) near the study area <br />are two-lane County State Aid Highways that are functionally classified as Collectors. Sunwood <br />Drive, a two-lane local street that extends in an east -west direction and connects Ramsey <br />Boulevard to Industry Avenue and Sunfish Lake Boulevard, is identified in the City of Ramsey <br />2001Comprehensive Plan as a future Collector. Anoka County is in the process of requesting a <br />functional class change for Industry Avenue and Armstrong Boulevard to upgrade their <br />designations to A -Minor Arterial. <br />21-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.