My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 10/15/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2018
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 10/15/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 11:03:43 AM
Creation date
10/15/2018 10:38:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
10/15/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 17.4 shows a comparison of discharge from the site for the existing and proposed <br />developed scenarios for the 100-year events. For existing conditions, a maximum peak <br />flow of 28.3 cfs under the Highway 10 culvert occurs during the 100-year, 10-day <br />snowmelt event. Peak flow discharge for proposed development conditions is slightly <br />less (25.3 cfs) than existing conditions, excluding infiltration and assuming that no bio- <br />retention facilities are i11l,u1pu1ated into the individual blocks. The existing peak flow <br />rate (12.4 cfs) is exceeded for the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event under proposed <br />developed conditions (25.1 cfs), but has been significantly reduced from the peak rate of <br />132.6 cfs at the culvert crossing the RR tracks. Since infiltration is excluded, the <br />numbers presented under proposed conditions are conservative. Slight reductions in peak <br />flow rate discharge at the outlet and significant reductions in volume discharge could be <br />achieved with the incorporation of properly designed and maintained infiltration basins. <br />Volume discharge reductions of 30 to 40 percent could be achieved assuming a moderate <br />rate of infiltration during the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event and some infiltration during <br />the last 15 days of the 30-day runoff simulation of the 100-year snowmelt event. <br />Table 17.4. Comparison of peak flows and volumes discharged from site for 100-year <br />events <br />Model <br />Existing conditions <br />Proposed <br />Proposed w/ some <br />infiltration occurring <br />100-year 24-hour rainfall <br />(5.9 inches precipitation) <br />Peak flow Volume <br />discharge (cfs) discharge (ac-ft) <br />12.4 <br />25.1 <br />24.7 <br />54.9 <br />150.3 <br />92.1 <br />100-year 10-day snowmelt <br />(7.2 inches runoff) <br />Peak flow Volume <br />discharge (cfs) discharge (ac-ft) <br />28.3 <br />25.3 <br />24.8 <br />334.7 <br />520.5 <br />356.2 <br />The primary benefit of incorporating infiltration BMPs into the site is achieved during <br />small storm events. Table 17.5 compares site discharge for the 1-year and 10-year, 24- <br />hour rainfall events considering site design that first excludes infiltration in the basins <br />and then considers infiltration in the basins. <br />For existing conditions, a peak flow of 2.3 cfs discharge at the Highway 10 culvert for the <br />1-year, 24-hour event is due to local drainage south of the railroad tracks only, as there is <br />no flow leaving the site at the railroad tracks. As discussed earlier, the flow discharging <br />from Highway 10 is small and does not reach the Mississippi River. For proposed <br />development conditions excluding infiltration in the basins, peak discharge into the <br />Mississippi River would be 14.4 cfs. By incorporating infiltration basins into the site, <br />peak flow is reduced by 50 percent (7.8 cfs) and volume discharge is also significantly <br />reduced.. The 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event results in a slight reduction in peak flow, <br />but significant reduction in volume (50 percent) by incorporating the infiltration BMPs. <br />17-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.