My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 10/16/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2018
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 10/16/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:19:26 AM
Creation date
10/15/2018 10:54:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
10/16/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramsey's standard pavement design. Though the design strength of this pavement design is less <br />than a typical industrial park pavement design, it should provide a useful life of at least 30 years <br />based on the life achieved by the existing pavement section. Staff also believes this development <br />will re -develop within the next 10 to 20 years, and that new streets will be required as a result of <br />re -development. <br />City Engineer Westby stated that this proposed project was brought to the Development Review <br />Committee on May 22, 2018 for staff comment on design alternatives based on potential future <br />development of the HY-10 Ramsey subdivision. Based on uncertainty of future development, <br />staff felt it would be most cost effective to bring the bituminous pavement up to usable <br />standards, extend utilities and concrete curb and gutter along 147th Avenue only, and not to <br />connect the streets to adjacent development at this time. The engineer's opinion of probable <br />costs including streets, drainage, and public water utilities is $ 290,000. Estimated costs include <br />10-percent contingency costs plus 23-percent indirect costs for administrative, engineering, <br />finance, and legal costs. A summary of the engineer's opinion of probable costs is included <br />in Appendix B of the attached Draft Feasibility Report <br />City Engineer Westby stated that the project is proposed to be funded using a combination of <br />special assessments to benefitting properties, street reconstruction bond proceeds, and <br />stormwater utility funds. Sewer and Water Utility Funds would be used to pay for any public <br />utility improvements. Nine parcels have been identified as receiving special benefit from the <br />improvements. Four of the parcels have permanent structures, and the other five are <br />undeveloped. Several of these parcels are currently listed for sale, including two City -owned <br />parcels. These parcels are identified in the preliminary Assessment Map and Roll in the Draft <br />Feasibility Report. <br />City Engineer Westby stated that assessments were calculated using the area method, which is <br />typically used for commercial applications. Staff recommends ordering a special benefit <br />consultation report for this project to verify the proposed assessment amount will not exceed the <br />benefit to the properties. If the report concludes the benefit to the properties is less than the <br />proposed preliminary assessment rate, staff will then propose to lower the assessment rate <br />accordingly during the Assessment Hearing, which is proposed for October 8, 2019. If the report <br />verifies the assessment rate as proposed is justified, staff will propose to adopt the final <br />assessment roll using the rate as preliminarily proposed. This project would best be constructed <br />as a stand-alone project and is necessary, feasible, and cost-effective from an engineering <br />standpoint, and can be constructed as proposed herein. <br />City Engineer Westby stated that staff originally intended to conduct a public information <br />meeting with benefiting property owners of HY-10 Ramsey while preparing the Feasibility <br />Report to explain the purpose and need for the proposed improvements, the scope of the <br />improvements, estimated costs, the proposed funding program, and proposed schedule. <br />However, due to growing uncertainties surrounding the future use of adjacent parcels, staff <br />determined it would be better to complete a draft Feasibility Report before scheduling and <br />conducting the public input meeting to help keep discussions focused. <br />City Engineer Westby stated that on August 28th staff plans to review the Feasibility Report with <br />Public Works Committee / August 21, 2018 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.