#18-227 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5. That the Subject Property is approximately 1.70 acres in size and is eligible for a total of 2,400 square feet of accessory building space and a maximum of three (3) detached accessory buildings. 6. That there is not an attached garage on the Subject Property so the existing detached garage (728 square feet) serves as the primary garage. 7. That behind the home is an in-ground pool, pool equipment shed (128 square feet), screened-in porch(252 square feet), and small utility shed(120 square feet). 8. That the Permittee is proposing to enlarge the existing detached garage by adding on another 728 square feet (26' x 28' addition), making the overall size of the detached garage 1,456 square feet. 9. That the addition would result in 1,956 total square footage of accessory building space on the Subject Property, which is within the allowable threshold based on the size of the Subject Property. 10. That the addition to the detached garage would be approximately 100 feet from the front property line while the home on the Subject Property is about 130 feet from the front property line. 11. That the minimum required setback in the R-1 Residential (MUSA) district is thirty (30) feet and the proposed addition would not encroach on this minimum requirement. 12. That the proposed addition would have an exterior finish consisting of stucco and would include soffits, fascia and architectural shingles to match existing garage and house. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. 2. That the proposed use will not substantially or adversely impair the use, enjoyment or market value of surrounding properties. 3. That the proposed use will be constructed so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and such use will not change the essential character of the area. 4. That the proposed use will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. 5. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. RESOLUTION#18-227 Page 2 of 7