Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 7:34 p.m. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Commissioner Surma asked if the City was considering making any safety improvements to <br /> Green Valley Road. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated shoulders could be added at some point, but <br /> noted a full reconstruct would be needed at some point. <br /> Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Surma, to recommend that City <br /> Council adopt Resolution #18-178 Granting Site Plan Approval and Approving an Amended <br /> Conditional Use Permit for Green Valley Green House's Greenhouse Operations. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners VanScoy, Surma, Anderson, <br /> Gengler, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Onyambu. <br /> 6. COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> 6.01: Consider Resolution #18-185 Approving Final Plat and Site Plan for Bunker Lake <br /> Industrial Park Second Addition (Project#18-130); Case of PSD,LLC <br /> Presentation <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill presented the Staff Report stating the purpose of this <br /> case is to review the proposed site plan for Bunker Lake Industrial Park Second Addition. While <br /> the resolution includes final plat approval, final plat is reviewed only by the City Council. The <br /> proposed project is located in the City's new business park located generally south of Bunker <br /> Lake Blvd and west of Armstrong Blvd. The proposed building is 60,800 square feet and would <br /> be the third building in the City's new industrial park. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked how the parking requirements for this site would be met without the <br /> City understanding what mix of tenants would be located within the building. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated with every project there is the building permit <br /> and site plan requirements for the outside shell. He reported individual buildouts also required a <br /> building permit. He explained overall staff was comfortable with the proposed parking. He <br /> noted the only concern with parking would be if the entire site were to fill with office. <br /> Matt Cooper, PSD, stated he understood the parking concerns but noted if a large office tenant <br /> were to occupy the building parking could be added to the rear of the building. He commented <br /> on the proposed color scheme for the building. <br /> Planning Commission/September 6, 2018 <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br />