Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill presented the Staff Report stating the purpose of this <br />case is to discuss a request from AKM Farms (Paxmar) to revise the current draft of the <br />Comprehensive Plan Update to change the future/planned land use of two parcels. This case is <br />for discussion only. The City will have until December of this year to make modifications to the <br />current draft. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Woestehoff asked if Puma Street would ever connect to Highway 10. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported this was not in the City's plan. <br />Commissioner Anderson questioned if the one acre lots would have their own well and septic. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented these lots were within the MUSA. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff stated he did not support the high density being proposed across the <br />street. He believed there should be a better transition zone. <br />Vice Chairperson VanScoy opened the meeting to comments or question from the public. <br />Alpha Development Parcel: <br />Leslie Clark, 15150 Kangaroo Street, stated her property abuts the R-1 and light yellow property. <br />She recommended this property remain R-1. She did not believe .25 acre lots would be a good <br />fit behind her home. She suggested if the land were rezoned she wanted to see the transition <br />language in writing and recommended this be signed by the developer. <br />Val Krueger, 15210 Kangaroo Street, noted her property abuts the bright yellow parcel. She <br />explained she has lived in her home for the past 40 years. She expressed concern with how the <br />plans for the bright yellow property have changed since a developer approached the City. She <br />encouraged the City to think through how many people would be crammed onto this property and <br />how this would impact the neighborhood. She understood the City could not stop the land from <br />being developed, but encouraged the City to keep the property zoned R-1. Lastly, she <br />commented on how her property value would be adversely impacted if a development with .25 <br />acre lots were placed in her backyard. <br />Vice Chairperson VanScoy questioned what the current zoning was for the bright yellow parcel. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated the property was currently zoned R-1 MUSA. <br />He clarified the size of lots that would be allowed today noting the minimum was .25 acres or 80 <br />feet in width. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff asked how large the bright yellow parcel was in size. <br />Planning Commission/August 2, 2018 <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />