My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2018
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:56:05 PM
Creation date
11/30/2018 9:32:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Shryock encouraged residents to continue to participate in the process. She <br />stated that if there is something proposed for a particular area, that does not mean that is the <br />exact location for that element and it simply means there is a placeholder for that element in the <br />future. She explained that this is a planning tool for the future but there are flexible elements. <br />She stated that the important thing about the document and planning process is that is helps keep <br />the City's vision for the future in sight and also helps to connect the community to neighboring <br />communities. She stated that this is a great process and appreciates the work that has gone into <br />this thus far. <br />7.06: Review Request from AKM Farms for Revision to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan <br />Update <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and stated that the <br />consensus of the Planning Commission and staff was as follows: <br />1. Northfork Parcel — the Planning Commission supports changing the Future Land Use <br />from Rural Developing to Medium Density Residential (the City Council could also <br />change to Low Density Residential as a compromise) <br />2. Alpha Development Parcel — the Planning Commission does not support the change from <br />Low Density Residential to a mix of Low Density Residential and Medium Density <br />Residential. The Planning Commission has reviewed this topic on several occasions and <br />recommends that this parcel stay as Low Density Residential, based on previous City <br />Council actions and neighborhood feedback. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he found it important to hear what the neighborhood wants <br />during the presentation and asked if staff has an opinion on the matter. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill replied that staff believes that low density residential <br />would be beneficial for the Alpha Development parcel and noted that there would be more <br />flexibility for the Northfork Inc. parcel and therefore would support more density in that area. <br />He believed that would be a fair compromise. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the last time the Council looked at the parcel for development, <br />the City was going to obtain trail right-of-way for part of the greenway corridor and asked if that <br />would remain or whether that would be eliminated if single-family residential is kept on that <br />parcel. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that the previous PUD request that was <br />reviewed needed some flexibility and that is how the greenway corridor portion was able to be <br />negotiated. He noted that the greenway could still be included as part of the trail plans and could <br />be negotiated as a part of park dedication. <br />Acting Mayor LeTourneau asked if staff would like separate action or would like one action. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that it would make sense to provide direction <br />separately and suggested just discussing the Alpha Development parcel and then once consensus <br />is reached the discussion can move to the Northfork Inc. parcel. <br />City Council / August 28, 2018 <br />Page 16 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.