My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2018
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:56:05 PM
Creation date
11/30/2018 9:32:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Kuzma stated that he would like to see a conceptual plan and that would help <br />him to make a decision. <br />Councilmember Johns echoed that comment. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that the Council has seen many proposals of what this could look <br />like. She believed that it would be appropriate to keep the site as low density, as that will <br />provide an adequate transition from the rural lots to the higher density in Capstone. <br />Acting Mayor LeTourneau stated that he also agrees that the entire site should remain low <br />density as the balance between urban and rural occurs in this location. He stated that he is <br />sensitive to the comments from the existing residents and is also amenable to the development of <br />the parcel and therefore would be open to allowing more density on the western portion of the <br />site. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he would like to see the conceptual layout as he believes that <br />the proposal would accommodate the low density on the east side, bordering the existing <br />residential, and then moving to medium density. <br />Councilmember Johns stated that she would like to look more broadly as she would have <br />concern with the properties to the north, as she believes those property owners would share the <br />concerns of the property owners to the east. She stated that even though the road would provide <br />a buffer, that higher density would change the character of that area and therefore suggested that <br />perhaps an L shape would more accurately provide the transitioning. She stated that she has less <br />concern with the western property moving to medium density but has concern protecting the <br />northern and eastern properties that currently exist. She stated that she would prefer to keep the <br />property low density but could consider a proposal that keeps low density on the east and north. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that perhaps concepts could be provided showing a diagonal split <br />or three quarters low density and one quarter medium density, rather than a traditional <br />north/south split. She agreed that she would like to see the north side protected. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the group has already approved the highest density in the north <br />because the neighborhoods to the north did not express opposition. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that is accurate. He stated that there were not <br />opposing comments from the neighbors to the north. He stated that when there is a road buffer, <br />there tends to be less opposition. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that when the Council agreed to move the higher density portion <br />of Capstone up, the decision was transportation driven. She stated that if people are interested in <br />seeing concepts she would be open to that otherwise she would support leaving the parcel low <br />density. <br />City Council / August 28, 2018 <br />Page 18 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.