My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2018
>
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:56:53 PM
Creation date
11/30/2018 9:54:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/23/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
660
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The City of Rogers Public Works Director plans to request City Council approval of the draft resolution on October <br />23rd. Dayton's City Engineer plans to request Council approval of the draft resolution on October 24th. The City of <br />Corcoran's Public Works Director plans to request City Council approval of the draft resolution on October 25th. <br />Each partner city will submit a copy of their executed resolution to the Ramsey City Engineer, who will then share <br />all executed resolutions with Met Council Staff as a package with a request to fund the study in its entirety using <br />Clean Water Funds. <br />Notification: <br />Notifications were not required for this case. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Observations: <br />The City of Ramsey is currently participating in the Metropolitan Council's Water Efficiency Potential Project. The <br />Metropolitan Council selected Ramsey to participate in the project based on current water use data and projected <br />population growth that showed Ramsey ranked 19th in water use per capita out of 94 metropolitan communities <br />with groundwater supplies and a large residential sector. Staff will meet with Metropolitan Council Staff in <br />November to review and discuss the study results, and will then share the results with the Environmental Policy <br />Board, Public Works Committee, City Council, and the public. <br />While discussing whether to participate in the Water Efficiency Potential Project, concerns were raised by the <br />Environmental Policy Board, and echoed by the Public Works Committee, as to whether participating in the Water <br />Efficiency Potential Project would benefit the City. In the end, the City Council voted to participate in the Water <br />Efficiency Potential Project, though the vote was not unanimous. In summary, the concerns focused on whether the <br />Metropolitan Council could use the results to force the City to implement water conservation practices that could <br />then result in higher water rates and increased taxes for City businesses and residents. <br />In response to the concerns raised, Staff shared the following response from Brian Davis with the Metropolitan <br />Council; <br />"The Metropolitan Council has no statutory authority regarding water use restrictions or water supply capital <br />improvements for any municipalities. Our work is conducted under the auspices ofMinnesota Statute 473.1565 (a <br />copy of this statute is attached to this case). We cannot impose any water use restrictions or water supply capital <br />improvements on any municipality. Furthermore, this project is not intended to support any such restrictions. <br />Many communities have raised the issue of revenue reductions resulting from water conservation. This project <br />assesses the economic potential of whether an aggressive water conservation program could reduce the <br />community's expansion ofwater supply wells to meet future residential needs. The focus on "economic potential" is <br />a critical point. If the summer peaking factor is reduced, will the existing wells be sufficient to meet the future water <br />demand as population increases? If so, how much money would be saved by not having to install and maintain <br />additional water supply wells? Such savings could translate to lower water rates over the long run, which is a <br />"win " for all parties. Conversely, if the costs of an aggressive water conservation program exceed the financial <br />savings resulting from a reduction in the number of new wells needed, then it would not make financial sense for a <br />community to pursue such a program. <br />We recognize that communities are not all the same. Instead of a one -size -fits -all approach to water conservation, a <br />more practical approach is to tailor such activities to the characteristics of each community. <br />Our project will help growing communities make financially sound long-term decisions regarding water supply <br />management. The information gained from this project could be useful for a utility when deciding whether or not to <br />pursue an aggressive water conservation program." <br />Staff wanted to share this response again to address similar concerns that may result from this request. Per the first <br />paragraph of the above response, the Metropolitan Council has no statutory authority regarding water use <br />restrictions or water supply capital improvements for any municipalities and therefore cannot impose any water use <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.