Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 7:34 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Surma asked if the City was considering making any safety improvements to <br />Green Valley Road. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated shoulders could be added at some point, but <br />noted a full reconstruct would be needed at some point. <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Surma, to recommend that City <br />Council adopt Resolution #18-178 Granting Site Plan Approval and Approving an Amended <br />Conditional Use Permit for Green Valley Green House's Greenhouse Operations. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners VanScoy, Surma, Anderson, <br />Gengler, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Onyambu. <br />6. COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />6.01: Consider Resolution #18-185 Approving Final Plat and Site Plan for Bunker Lake <br />Industrial Park Second Addition (Project #18-130); Case of PSD, LLC <br />Presentation <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the Staff Report stating the purpose of this <br />case is to review the proposed site plan for Bunker Lake Industrial Park Second Addition. While <br />the resolution includes final plat approval, final plat is reviewed only by the City Council. The <br />proposed project is located in the City's new business park located generally south of Bunker <br />Lake Blvd and west of Armstrong Blvd. The proposed building is 60,800 square feet and would <br />be the third building in the City's new industrial park. <br />Commission Business <br />Chairperson Bauer asked how the parking requirements for this site would be met without the <br />City understanding what mix of tenants would be located within the building. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated with every project there is the building permit <br />and site plan requirements for the outside shell. He reported individual buildouts also required a <br />building permit. He explained overall staff was comfortable with the proposed parking. He <br />noted the only concern with parking would be if the entire site were to fill with office. <br />Matt Cooper, PSD, stated he understood the parking concerns but noted if a large office tenant <br />were to occupy the building parking could be added to the rear of the building. He commented <br />on the proposed color scheme for the building. <br />Planning Commission/September 6, 2018 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />