My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/01/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/01/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:32:00 AM
Creation date
1/11/2019 10:20:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/01/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin September 10, 2018 I Volume 12 I Issue 17 <br />engineer providing the technical evidence and documentation "demonstrating <br />that the increase in the 100-year flood elevation that will be caused by the <br />proposed construction, development, use or activity will have no adverse ef- <br />fect on downstream properties," as required by the Township Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br />Finding that the DiPaolos failed to prove the necessary criteria, the court <br />concluded that the Enforcement Notices were not barred by laches, estoppel, <br />vested rights or justifiable reliance doctrines. <br />See also: Springfield Tp. v. Kim, 792 A.2d 717 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002). <br />See also: In re Kreider; 808A.2d 340 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002). <br />See also: Borough of Dormont v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Borough of <br />Dormont, 850 A.2d 826 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004). <br />Zoning News from Around the <br />Nation <br />INDIANA <br />A zoning applicant has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the City of Fort <br />Wayne's decision to allow a downtown strip club to reopen. Specifically, the <br />lawsuit argues that denial violated the applicant's right to free speech and <br />equal protection, and also seeks to void city codes governing adult businesses. <br />The applicant claims its strip club use was grandfathered as a preexisting, <br />nonconforming use, but the city maintains the use had been abandoned for <br />more than one year. <br />S ource: News -Sentinel; www.news-sentinel.com <br />NEW JERSEY <br />Jersey City's Zoning Board recently ruled in favor of a neighborhood <br />association. The association had argued that the "so-called mezzanines on the <br />ground and top floors of the new building [were] so large they should be <br />considered additional stories," —two more stories than allowable by city zon- <br />ing ordinances. The city's zoning laws "do not allow mezzanines to constitute <br />more than 33.3 percent of 'the total floor area in the room or story in which the <br />mezzanine floor occurs.' " Otherwise, if they exceed that size, they are <br />considered additional stories. While opposing sides in this case agreed on the <br />square footage of the mezzanines, they disagreed about what they should be <br />compared to. The neighborhood association had argued that the Zoning Board <br />must compare each mezzanine to the room they are in, and that therefore, in <br />this case, the residential units' mezzanines were anywhere from 48% to 62% <br />of the total area. <br />Source: NJ.com; www.ni.com <br />PENNSYLVANIA <br />The Harrisburg -based Independence Law Center filed a federal lawsuit <br />© 2018 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.