My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/06/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/06/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:32:50 AM
Creation date
1/11/2019 10:24:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/06/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commission Business <br />Commissioner Anderson expressed concerns with the proposed 24-foot-wide road within the <br />new development. He noted the City's standard roadway width was 28 feet and he would like to <br />see the applicant make a change to comply with this requirement. He asked if houses 5 through <br />10 could be flipped to have the backyards facing each other. He stated he did not like the fact <br />that one of the lots would have three streets around it. <br />Mark Strandland, 1696 229th Avenue NE in East Bethel, reported the original plat had Potassium <br />Street at 24 feet. He indicated if the roadway width were to change, the development would have <br />an increased impact on the wetlands. In addition, the cost share for this roadway would increase. <br />He commented he was not interested in flipping the street adjacent to lots 5 through 10 as these <br />lots currently had a full walk -out basement. He described the location of the proposed retaining <br />walls noting the homes would be less visually impactful if the plans were to remain as is given <br />the topography of the land. He noted landscaping would be added near the retaining wall to <br />assist with screening. <br />Commissioner Anderson encouraged the applicant to work with City staff to bring the street up <br />to City Code requirements. <br />Mr. Strandland stated he would speak with the City Engineer to try and make something work <br />but anticipated an increase in the roadway width would have a negative impact on the <br />surrounding wetlands. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked what type of landscaping was being proposed for the top of the <br />retaining walls. <br />Ms. Strandland reported there would be shrubs and pine trees. <br />Patrick Hampton, 15551 Potassium Street NW, explained he lived across the street from the <br />proposed development. He expressed frustration that he did not receive a notice from the City <br />regarding this Planning Case. He questioned who would be responsible for paying for the <br />upgrades to Potassium Street. He reported he spent close to $30,000 in attorney's fees 12 years <br />ago to ensure his land would remain as is. He stated he did not want to lose any more of his land <br />and was not in favor of paying excessive roadway assessments. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked if the City would be seeking additional land from adjacent landowners <br />if Potassium Street were to increase its width to 28 feet. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported the additional width would have to come <br />from the applicant. He explained no assessments were being proposed at this time. He noted the <br />project would be cost -shared between the City and the developer. <br />June Hampton, 15551 Potassium Street NW, explained 12 years ago she was forced to prove that <br />she owned the road, which her husband put in. She encouraged the City to not reopen old <br />Planning Commission/November 1, 2018 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.