Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin October 25, 2018 I Volume 12 I Issue 20 <br />Life because "the comparison of the full use of one assembly or institution <br />compared to the full use of another type of assembly or institution" was <br />necessary for the purposes of the analysis of similar comparators. Finally, <br />the court rejected daycares as a "similarly situated" comparator, finding <br />that "daycares generate far more revenue on a per -square -foot basis than <br />Tree of Life would." <br />Because Tree of Life could not establish that its proposed religious <br />school was being treated on less than equal terms than a similarly situated <br />nonreligious assembly or institution, the court concluded that its RLUIPA <br />equal terms claim failed. <br />See also: Primera Iglesia Bautista Hispana of Boca Raton, Inc. u <br />Broward County, 450 E3d 1295 (11 th Cir. 2006). <br />See also: Lighthouse Institute for Evangelism, Inc. v. City of Long <br />Branch, 510 E3d 253 (3d Cir, 2007). <br />See also: River of Life Kingdom Ministries v. Village of Hazel Crest, Ill., <br />611 E3d 367 (7th Cir. 2010). <br />Case Note: <br />In its decision, the Sixth Circuit noted a "disagreement among the circuits about <br />how RLUIPA's equal terms provision should be applied." The court ultimately <br />found the Eleventh Circuit provided the most "clear and persuasive" statement of <br />the equal terms provision's statutory requirements, and adopted those elements. <br />First Amendment City ordinance <br />restricts and regulates food <br />sharing in public spaces <br />Non-profit organization that shares food to <br />communicate its message argues says ordinance <br />violates the First Amendment rights of free speech <br />and free association <br />Citation: Fort Lauderdale Food Not Bombs v. City of Fort Lauderdale, <br />2018 WL 4000057 (11 th Cir. 2018) <br />The Eleventh Circuit has jurisdiction over Alabama, Florida, and <br />Georgia. <br />ELEVENTH CIRCUIT (FLORIDA) (08/22/18)—This case addressed <br />the issue of whether an organization's food sharing is expressive conduct <br />protected by the First Amendment, such that the organization could bring a <br />valid claim that an ordinance regulating "social services facilities" uses— <br />© 2018 Thomson Reuters 5 <br />