Laserfiche WebLink
7.04: Consider Request to Rezone Property Identified by PID #35-32-25-32-0062 from R-1 <br />Residential (MUSA) to E-1 Employment (Project No. 155); Case of Rocky Mtn <br />Investment LLC <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation from <br />the Planning Commission that the property remain as R-1 Residential (MUSA). <br />Councilmember Riley referenced the triangle piece of property and asked if that is owned by 6250 <br />and is unimproved. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that is owned by 6250 and is unimproved <br />and perhaps used as yard space. He stated that there is not currently any outdoor storage or parking <br />for that area. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked if the additional fencing would help support a rezoning of this <br />parcel. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that fencing could help but a variance would <br />also be needed for transitioning and it would still be clear that outdoor storage is occurring. He <br />stated that notification was provided to the neighboring property owners and no comments were <br />received so perhaps the neighbors do not mind, but again noted that variances would be required <br />to allow that activity. <br />Greg Dahlheimer, Rocky Mountain Investment Group, stated that he was not trying to be unlawful <br />as the tax statement identifies the property as commercial/industrial. He stated that he believes <br />that the property is already fenced. <br />Jeremy Anderson, Countryside Services, stated that this property is fenced with a gravel entrance <br />that he has maintained for a number of years. He stated that his intention would simply be to <br />continue to store trailers on the property as he has done. He stated that he has pictures of <br />neighboring commercial properties that have fences and outdoor storage. He stated that he could <br />not see a resident wanting to build a home on this property. He noted that when the neighboring <br />blacksmith holds a class, both sides of the road are packed full of vehicles and he has even allowed <br />shared parking on his lot for the classes. He stated that some of the neighboring property owners <br />have even stored trailers on this property. He stated that the neighbors all get along and he plows <br />out the other businesses for no charge. He acknowledged that there are eyesores in the area but <br />did not believe that his property was one of them. He stated that he is growing his property and is <br />looking for a small lot to store trailers. He stated that he would comply with any necessary <br />conditions. He stated that the blacksmith building next door would not be ideal to be located next <br />to a residential property. He stated that he desires to continue the activity that he has done on the <br />property. He stated that his business has grown from four employees to ten employees and is <br />simply looking for a little additional space for the trailers. He stated that his business sells and <br />services snowplows and even services the City snowplows. <br />