Laserfiche WebLink
Commission Business <br /> Commissioner Anderson expressed concerns with the proposed 24-foot-wide road within the <br /> new development. He noted the City's standard roadway width was 28 feet and he would like to <br /> see the applicant make a change to comply with this requirement. He asked if houses 5 through <br /> 10 could be flipped to have the backyards facing each other. He stated he did not like the fact <br /> that one of the lots would have three streets around it. <br /> Mark Strandland, 1696 229th Avenue NE in East Bethel, reported the original plat had Potassium <br /> Street at 24 feet. He indicated if the roadway width were to change,the development would have <br /> an increased impact on the wetlands. In addition, the cost share for this roadway would increase. <br /> He commented he was not interested in flipping the street adjacent to lots 5 through 10 as these <br /> lots currently had a full walk-out basement. He described the location of the proposed retaining <br /> walls noting the homes would be less visually impactful if the plans were to remain as is given <br /> the topography of the land. He noted landscaping would be added near the retaining wall to <br /> assist with screening. <br /> Commissioner Anderson encouraged the applicant to work with City staff to bring the street up <br /> to City Code requirements. <br /> Mr. Strandland stated he would speak with the City Engineer to try and make something work <br /> but anticipated an increase in the roadway width would have a negative impact on the <br /> surrounding wetlands. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked what type of landscaping was being proposed for the top of the <br /> retaining walls. <br /> Ms. Strandland reported there would be shrubs and pine trees. <br /> Patrick Hampton, 15551 Potassium Street NW, explained he lived across the street from the <br /> proposed development. He expressed frustration that he did not receive a notice from the City <br /> regarding this Planning Case. He questioned who would be responsible for paying for the <br /> upgrades to Potassium Street. He reported he spent close to $30,000 in attorney's fees 12 years <br /> ago to ensure his land would remain as is. He stated he did not want to lose any more of his land <br /> and was not in favor of paying excessive roadway assessments. <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked if the City would be seeking additional land from adjacent landowners <br /> if Potassium Street were to increase its width to 28 feet. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reported the additional width would have to come <br /> from the applicant. He explained no assessments were being proposed at this time. He noted the <br /> project would be cost-shared between the City and the developer. <br /> June Hampton, 15551 Potassium Street NW, explained 12 years ago she was forced to prove that <br /> she owned the road, which her husband put in. She encouraged the City to not reopen old <br /> Planning Commission/November 1,2018 <br /> Page 7 of 12 <br />