Laserfiche WebLink
square footage to 53.17, per sign, With two (2) foot' high letters, in order to have a proportionately <br />sized sign on the front and back °fthe building. The applicant has stated that a sign meeting the <br />current restrictions looks~ severely disPropOrtiOnate on such a large building. Neither of the signs <br />would project from the wall more than six (6)inChes. <br /> <br />The City has, in the past, granted conditional Use Permits for signs larger than allowed under City <br />Ordinances. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission conducted a pub!ie hearing regarding Leroy Signs' request on <br />February 3, 2005 and there was n0:public i~pUt; ;However,-there was some dlscussion regarding <br />the appropriateness of the proposed sign size. :Due to the fact that this is a large, single tenant <br />building, Staff believes that that the increasedSign size is not only proportionate to the building <br />fagade but is also appropriate in terms ofscaJe. <br /> · <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommended aPVroval of the request by a 3-2 vote. City staff is also <br />recommending approval of the request to exceed the sign size restrictions. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to adopt findings of fact relating to ?roy Signs, Inc. request for a conditional use permit <br />to exceed sign size restrictions established in City Code. <br /> <br />-and- <br /> <br />Motion to approve Leroy Signs, Inc. reques~ to exceed sign size restrictions based on the findings <br />of fact, and adopt a resolution declaring terms Of conditional use permit. <br /> <br />-or- <br /> <br />Motion to deny Leroy Signs, Inc. request to exceed sign size restrictions as proposed, based on <br />the findings of fact. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br />Assistant Community Development Director <br />Associate Planners <br /> <br />CC: 02/22/05 <br /> <br /> <br />