Laserfiche WebLink
Assistant Community Development <br /> D~rector:Trudgeon stated they do want to be festrictive with <br />size but felt with a building this .1_.~. ge :the' size ~as appropriate. He noted the Ordinance says 24 <br />square feet or five percent of thd iground fl6or fagade, whichever is less, however five percent <br />would be ninety-six square feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shepherd that other; large bu~ldings!us'e ground signs to help increase visibility. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Developman.t Direct0r~ Tmdgeon no.ted that the building is two feet from <br />the lot line because it is in the TOM Cente~zOnigg not an option. He <br />stated this sign size would not be'an issue :if? it were not in zoning district. <br /> <br />Jim Deal, NAU, indicated the SiSn is no~ that square footage of the <br />building. He stated it is a little 10ve~; One tg, ~.~'~i$ will look <br />proportionate. He added the sign~will be 24 will not <br />be able to read it. <br /> <br />Jim C Leroy Signs, Inc. adV~sedithe5 and pleasing to the <br />eye. He stated when you get thirt~ feet offl. the be-larger, and because <br />of the L-shape of the building, at one time. He <br />indicated the building is 179 feetOn One only 25 feet of the <br />sign will show at. one time. He adde¢ 'entryway they felt this size sign <br />was reasonable without being <br /> <br />Commissioner Shepherd asked so the lettering could be <br />smaller. <br /> <br />Mr. C indicated that <br />they did not think the si <br /> <br /> ~s a very decorative entrance area, and <br /> on the glass. <br /> <br />the sign is appropriate and is unique enough to <br /> <br />Commissioner' :~s.'/6~ted <br />warrant~. <br /> <br /> ~: ? ~. ' .; ~ ' -~,~!~~. <br />~C~:'~' ::' added thata~~~~ woUld bloeE ~e site of traffic because it would have t° be so <br /> street. <br />clbSe [0,.the <br /> <br />commi~'si~hervan Scoy ask e heigh~ of~the building should be included as something that <br />makes i~ ~eP~ble. <br />Commissioner B~s0~ that would be helphl to &stlngmsh ~t from other buildings in the <br />~ture, and agreed to; ~ as a condihomof hfs motion to approve the findings. Chaicerson <br />Nixt agreed with this a~dment t0 the m0iiOn; <br /> <br />Commissioner Shepherd noted the sign eopld be mourned in the wall. She indicated she feels <br />they are defeating their original vision oflimiting silage in the Town Center zoning district by <br />allowing this large of a sign. <br /> <br /> Planning Commissi°n~ebrua~. 3, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br />