My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/22/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 02/22/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:41:25 PM
Creation date
2/18/2005 3:19:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/22/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Elvig indicated his suggestion wOuld be to eliminate approximately 30 percent <br />of the units. They should be replaced with :a larger sized and quality unit that would be sold at a <br />higher price. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen concurred; She explained she does not necessarily have a problem <br />with the detached townhomes, but she does have a problem with this whole development and <br />how it is being laid out. This looks like an !R-2 development without any benefits of the PUD to <br />the City. Other concerns are the bgffer between ithe private street and the neighboring properties <br />to the north. She also has conceffis regarding POtassium Street, and this should be looked into. <br />Above and beyond that, the Environmen¢I policy Board discussed the policy of drafting a <br />wetland buffer ordinance. This ordinance Will not apply to this development, but she hopes the <br />developer would be willing to meet Some Of the aspects of that policy. The wetland is a great <br />feature of this piece of property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook stated he does :not have a:problem with the concept of the PUD or the <br />detached townhomes. He is con~emed that the nUmber of units has been increased. He thinks <br />the reason for the PUD is to help protect the Wetlands and the PUD will allow them to utilize this <br />wetland and greenspace. The deVeloPer should concentrate on reducing the number of units, <br />providing more greenspace, and providing some sort of recreational area in the greenspace for the <br />residents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey stated he agrees regarding the density and the greenspace. His big <br />concern is the location of Potassium Street, and it should be centered if possible. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson clarified the discussion regarding Potassium Street is to <br />shift the road over 33 feet and give 33 feet back t° the property owner to the east. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec expressed concern with the length of the street extending to the cul-de-sac. This <br />street should be reviewed with the Public ~Works Department to be sure there are no plowing <br />concerns. He stated he is not concerned with the detached townhomes, but has concern with the <br />density and the buffering. It would' be nice to have an area for the residents to get together, <br />possibly with a gazebo. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson-eXplained the street extending to the cul-de-sac was first <br />proposed as a private street. Staff had concerns about the length of the street and requested it be <br />a public street. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson commente~d he likes the detached townhome concept. He suggested the <br />residents drive around and look a..t some of the detached townhomes to see how nice some of <br />them are. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised the next step Will be preliminary plat and a public hearing at the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />City Council/January 25, 2005 <br /> Pa.ge 10 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.