Laserfiche WebLink
allocated among ~me UnSold subject Property pursuant to the percentages <br />set forth on Exhibit F-I.:: ~The special assessment will be payable in a <br />single installmefft; but the City will defer the obligation to pay the special <br />assessment until the earlierlof (i) the date three years after the date the City <br />levies the spec!al: assessment or(ii) the date the City approves a final plat <br />replatting all or a.portion of the Unsold Subject Property. Clause (ii) of <br />the'preceding sentence dOes not apply to final plats the City approved <br />prior to the date Of thisFitst Amendment and does not apply to the final <br />plat of RAMSEy TOWN CENTER 5TH ADDITION which has received <br />final plat approVa[ fi.om the City Council but which is being modified and <br />will be reapproved prior to being recorded. Interest will accrue on the <br />unpaid balance of the defe~r~ ed special assessment at the rate of 6.3% per <br />annum. If the DeVelOPer rePlats a portion of the Unsold Subject Property <br />the special assessment will be due only with respect to the tax parcel or tax <br />parcels that include all or any pOrtion of the Unsold Subject Property that <br />is being replatted and the Special assessment will remain deferred for the <br />balance of the Unsold Subject Property. The Developer and the Interested <br />Parties hereby consent to the'City's levying of a special assessment against <br />the UnsOld Subj ~efft .property for the Parking Improvements in an amount <br />equal to $6,000,000, purs .u,3r_nt to Minnesota Statutes, Section 459.14 and <br />Chapter 429, the City Charter and the City Ordinances and hereby waive <br />'any and all procedural and isubstantive objections to a special assessment <br />in that :amount, including,! but not limited to, notice and hearing <br />requirements, claims that the Unsold Subject Property does not receive a <br />benefit .from the Parking ImProvements, claims that property other than <br />the Unsold Subject ProPerty receives a benefit from the Parking <br />Improvements, claims that :the aSsessment is not uniform upon the same <br />classes of prope~ and claims that the amount of the special assessment <br />allocated to any lot Or Outlot pUrsuant to Exhibit F-1 exceeds the benefit to <br />such lotOr outlot,: The DeveloPer and the Interested Parties also waive <br />any appeal fights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, <br />Section 459.14 or: Minnesota StatUtes, Section 429.081 and any rights <br />available under the City charter Or the City Ordinances. The consents and <br />waivers Set forth in this SeCtion 9,2 run with title to the Subject Property <br />and are binding on the Developer and its successors and assigns. Until the <br />City levies the special assessm~t, the special assessment constitutes a <br />pending :special assessment. If a subsequent final plat for a Phase <br />subdivides one or tuore of the lots or outlots referenced on Exhibit F-I, the <br />City must allocate the Special assessment pending or levied against that lot <br />or outlot among the lots 0rl Outlots created by such final plat. The <br />Developer or a Secondary !Developer, if applicable, tuust prepare and <br />submit to the City, :for its reView, a proposed allocation of the pending or <br />levied special aSsessm~ts among the lots or outlots created by such final <br />plat. The City must adopt .the Developer's or, if applicable, a Secondary <br />Developer's proposed allocation if the Developer's or, if applicable, a <br />Secondary Developer's :propoSed allocation is done on a per square foot <br /> <br />1710652v6 <br /> <br /> <br />