Laserfiche WebLink
fortunate that is not a part of the request and would support bringing the compensation up to <br />match the duties performed. <br />Motion by Councilmember Kuzma, seconded by Councilmember Shryock, to Adopt Resolution <br />#19-036 to Approve Reclassifying a Parks Maintenance Worker to Lead Parks Maintenance <br />Worker. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor LeTourneau, Councilmembers Kuzma, Shryock, and <br />Heinrich. Voting No: Councilmember Musgrove. Absent: Councilmember Riley. <br />7.04: Adopt Resolution #19-032 Extending Certain Community Development Professional <br />Services Contracts <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation to 1) <br />continue to contract with WSB Associates for Planning Division support for a period of three <br />years, a new contract will be forwarded to a future Council date for consideration; 2) continue to <br />contract with Inspectron, Inc. for Building Inspection Division support for a period of one year, <br />the existing contract has a built in extension that can be canceled with appropriate notice; and 3) <br />continue to contract with Tokle Inspections for Electrical Code Administration for a period of <br />three years, the existing contract has a built in extension that can be canceled with appropriate <br />notice. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked if extending the contract for three years would hold the current <br />rates for three years. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that if a rate change was proposed in the <br />future, that would come forward to the Council for consideration. <br />Councilmember Heinrich stated that she is not comfortable with the three-year extension without <br />RFPs. She stated that gauging the market is something she believes is important and therefore <br />would support an extension of one year. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that when there is an agency you work well with, that <br />consistency is important and therefore she would support the extension of three years, with a <br />one-year extension for Inspectron. She noted that if there is concern in the future, the City would <br />have the ability to cancel the contract. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she likes the proposals as presented. She asked if an RFP <br />could be requested during the extension period. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that if the City decided to reevaluate <br />during the three-year period, that would be allowed. He stated that if the cancelation process is <br />followed there would be no liability, noting that the notice required is 30 to 60 days. <br />Councilmember Heinrich asked and received confirmation that this would not be an ideal time <br />for the RFP process because it would align with the busy construction season. <br />City Council / January 22, 2019 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />