Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner JohnsOn, SeConded by Chairperson Nixt to recommend that City <br />Council approve Leroy .Signs, Inc~ request :tO'exceed sign size restrictions based on the findings <br />of fact, and adopt a resolution declaring terms of Conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Cha!rperson NLxt, Commissioners Johnson, and Van Scoy. Voting <br />No: Commissioners Shepherd and Watson, Absent: None. <br /> <br />Case #2: Request for Site Plan Review;Case of Bertolas & Pekula ~ <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald advised ~hat BertOlas & Pekula applied for site plan review of a multi- <br />tenant two level office facility on the Property ilocated at the intersection of 141st Avenue and <br />Azurite Street. She stated the site plan irs ProPOsing to construct a 12,528 square foot office <br />facility, is .92 acres in size, and is ZonedE-2 Employment. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated the site pian eXceeds all required setbacks. She advised lot <br />coverage has been calculated at 16%, Which is Under the 45% maximum lot coverage restriction <br />established in City Code. She indicated:the Site ,Plan is subject to 42 parking stalls, and 51 stalls <br />are being provided. She noted the site will derive access from 1.41st Avenue. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald explaine~d the prOpOsed rock face concrete block and glass accents <br />proposed for exterior materials ate permitted~and desired in the E-2 District.. She stated the <br />grading and drainage plan is generally; aCCeptable with the revisions Outlined in the City Staff <br />Review Letter. She noted that a drainage and utility easement will need to be obtained from the <br />adjacent property in order for the ~opoSed drainage plan to be acceptable. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated the landscaping Plan is generally acceptable in accordance with <br />the City Staff Review Letter. Sh~ noted.~e prOposed development is a direct result of a Tax. <br />Increment Financing initiated project. She stated Staffrecommends site plan approval contingent <br />upon compliance with City Staff KevieWLetter dated January 28, 2005. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the applicant has had a chance to review the Staff ReView Letter. <br /> <br />Denny Sharp, applicant, stated he has :read :dael letter and does not have any concerns. <br />indicated they can resolve the few things mentiOned in the letter. <br /> <br />He <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if Staff had the necessary drainage plan or if a revised plan is needed. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald indicated a revised plan is needed, but Staff will work with the applicant <br />on it and they feel confident they Will get it resolved. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairperson Nixt to recommend that the City' <br />Council grant approval of the prOposed Site plan contingent upon compliance With City Staff <br />Review Letter dated January 28, 2005. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February <br /> : Phge 5 of 15 <br /> <br />3, 2005 <br /> <br />P5 <br /> <br /> <br />