Laserfiche WebLink
.! 5 :.. <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired al~out the siZe.of the units. <br /> <br />Mr. Strandlund replied the units will be ramblers with 1,500 to 1,600 square feet on the main <br />level with finished basements. · <br /> <br />Dave Johnson, 15423 Potassium Street, questioned when Potassium Street was determined to be <br />a public road. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied thc City h~ maintained'the road for some time. He indicated he <br />will provide Mr. Johnson with his research off the road. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated he, does not :believe PotasSium Street is a public street. Also, he feels <br />Potassium Street should:be moved!t° be righ~d~ the Property line. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson asked if there is a City ordinance that requires all roads in the City to be <br />centered on the property line .... <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied it is typical in the City to center the roads, but it is <br />not required by ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated this development <br /> WOuld include 52 units and half of the traffic would be <br />coming down Potassium Street, as well as the 22 :units next to him. He stated the traffic should <br />be routed on CR 5 some other way~ . <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied one of the problems !woOl6 be getting the county to grant access to CR 5,' <br />however, Mr. Johnson's comments wit! berevieWed., <br /> <br />Patrick Hampton, 15551 Potassimn Street~. stated he Will be right across the street from this <br />abomination if it goes in. His father Spent :,the money putting Potassium Street in. if he recalls, <br />after the City maintains a road for 'seven'Years .it !becomes a public road, however, in the 80's his <br />father repeatedly asked the City Sot to maintain the road. The City continued to maintain the <br />road and is now saying they own the imad; ~ He:.stated their property line is 30 feet from the road <br />and now more of their property Will be taken. ~ He thinks the road should be centered on the <br />property line. Also, after these develOpers!are l°ng gone and have made their money, someone <br />will say this road cannot handle the v°lumeland assess the property owners to widen the road. <br />He stated he is not opposed to the builders :d¢¥eloping their property, but this development is <br />pretty high density. His final POint is 'if;t~i$ .development. is built as it is presented it will <br />substantially reduce the resale of his prOperty, because of the high density housing next to it. The <br />landowners will have to live with the conseqUences of the builder's actions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig asked if Mr. HamptOn is against the road being public and Paved if it is <br />centered. <br /> <br />Ci~ Coun~cil/J~a~uary 25, 2005 · ' ,page~7!of 24 <br /> <br />P23 <br /> <br /> <br />