Laserfiche WebLink
installing a trail along the entir¥lengthi°~:gtate :Highway #47 connecting to 142nd Avenue, and <br />suggested the terminus of the trail on the Hgliday Station property be connected to the sidewalk <br />along Xkimo Street. The park; and Reereati6n Commission recommended that the trail be <br />installed along Highway #47 sogth to 14~2na -Avenue. Staff· is recommending that the trail be <br />constructed from the Holiday station along' Highway` #47 to the north line of the old Amoco <br />station, as the City is currently, i~negotiati9ns :f0r acquiring the Amoco property at this time. She <br />advised based on the conversation with the~ previous case some revisions will need to be made to <br />the development agreement. The biggeS~tichaj!ge relates to Item No. 12 regarding the trail <br />development and fees. The development ggreement states the developer is subject to trail fees; <br />however, the previous case waiYed the trfiif feeS. The motion should be to adopt a resolution <br />granting final plat approval and: gnter~ into ;a id~elopment agreement with Steve Feldman and <br />Riverside Companies, contingent, on Staff ensuring that the documents from Case No. 4 and Case <br />No. 5 are in agreement. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Ots°n;, second~dbYCouncilmember Cook, to adopt Resolution//05- <br />02-049 granting final plat approval antigen.ret in~t° a development agreement with Steve Feldman <br />and Riverside Companies, contingent On. staff ensuring that the documents from Case No. 4 and <br />Case No. 5 are in agreement. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Steve Feldman, appl!Cant; inquired about the' contingency to the motion. <br />Councilmember Cook explained-i~f Case NO. 4!g0es through and the trail dedication is eliminated <br />it will also be eliminated in the develoPrae~t:agi'e~ment for Case No. '5. Associate Planner Wald <br />clarified this relates only to trail dedication; not park dedication. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: 'Mayor PrOTem Elvig, Councilmembers Olson, Cook, Jeffrey, <br />Pearson, and Strommen. Voting,o: None.: Absent: Mayor Gamec. <br />Case #6: Request for'Final plat APproval of Ramsey Office; Case of Steven Feldman <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald explained Steve Feldman submitted,a site plan for the development of a <br /> rd <br />multi-tenant office facility on tlxe ~propertyil6Cated south of 143 Avenue, west of Xkimo Street, <br />and east of State HighWay #47 located immediately adjacent to the old Amoco Station. Mr. <br />Feldman is proposing to constru¢~ a 12}000 idqUare foot-office facility on Lot 1, Block 1, in the <br />proposed Ramsey Office Park SUbdiVision./.i The subject pr°perty is 1.45 acres in size and is <br />zoned B-1 Business. The subj.~e~t prope~:i.S !located within the Scenic Overlay District and <br />subject to 30 percent imperviou.81 coVerag~ ;restriction, which includes building-and pavement. <br />The site plan is proposing 49 pement:buil4ing and pavement coverage. A variance was granted <br />by the Board of Adjustment on ~nUary 6?2005 allowing a maximum of 55 percent impervious <br />surface. , <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald explai[ed in 1'9~80 the City agreed to alloTM any development that <br />occurred on the subject property t0 deviate ;fromiall setbacks and lot sizes by 25 percent. The site <br />plan meets front, side, rear yard,I and Parking/maneuvering area setbacks established in the B-1 <br />District. The site plan is required to ProVide 40 parking stalls and 53 are shown. There is a <br />portion of parking that has been:dedicated as future parking ·with 17 stalls, and the applicant <br /> <br /> City Co. . ruary 8, 200S <br /> i Page23 of 30 <br /> <br />P63 <br /> <br /> <br />