My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/12/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 03/12/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:24:41 PM
Creation date
3/15/2019 4:26:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/12/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.04: Public Hearing: Consider Amendment to Chapter 117, Section 111 and 112 to Modify <br />the R-1 Residential and R-2 Residential Zoning Districts to Allow 50- and 65-Foot- <br />Wide Lots and Clarifying Existing Language <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 9:26 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl presented the staff report stating the purpose of this case is to review <br />a proposed zoning amendment (text) to allow 50- and 65-foot-wide lots. The case came forward <br />as part of the Harvest Estates 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat application, but is being handled and <br />treated as a separate case. The proposed zoning amendment (text) modifies both R-1 and R-2 <br />regulations, while consolidating and making the R-2 section easier to read and utilize. These <br />changes have been requested by a number of Developers over the past several years. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained the City would be creating a district that <br />would allow 50- and 65-foot-wide lots based on changing market conditions. He reported the City <br />has been allowing 50- and 65-foot-wide lots through the PUD process, however, this would codify <br />a change in City Code. <br />Citizen Input <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked why setbacks were being changed. He feared that the proposed <br />setbacks would make it difficult for new neighborhoods to have sidewalks or be able to park cars <br />in driveways. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated a 25-foot front yard setback would allow for <br />sidewalks and proper driveway length to allow for cars to be parked. <br />Commissioner VanScoy questioned if staff had received feedback from the Fire Department <br />regarding the reduced side yard setback. <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl stated she reached out to the Police and Fire Departments regarding <br />this matter. She noted the Police Department did not have any concerns. She explained the Fire <br />Marshall supported a 10-foot separation between buildings, or a five-foot side yard setback. She <br />suggested the language regarding the separation for detached villas be changed from 15 feet to 10 <br />feet in the R-2 district. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated he would support a 30-foot front yard setback. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill discussed how neighborhood design was changing <br />and certain neighborhoods were bringing their homes closer to the street. He discouraged the <br />Commission from changing the front yard setback from 25 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.