Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Maygr:Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, Cich <br />and Peterson. Voting No:ilNone~ ~: ~: ~: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember DeLuca:and seconded by Councilmember Cich to adopt <br />Resolution #89-11-321 awarding a!contract to Norwest Investment Services for General <br />Obligation tax increment Bonds Series: 1989B. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: MayOr Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, Cich <br />and Peterson, Voting No:. None; . · <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmembcr DCLuca and seconded by Councilmember Cich to adopt <br />Resolution #89-11-322 awardinga cOnn-~ct to Allison-Williams Company for General <br />Obligation Taxable Tax InCrement Bonds. Series 1989C. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: MaYOr Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, Cich <br />and Peterson. Voting No: :None. <br /> <br />City Council recessed at 9:30 p.m.: <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann called the meeting back toOrder at 9:37 p.m. <br /> <br />Case #6: Nudity Ordinance:· <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich noted that; City Co, unciI ~has been provided with a proposed Nudity <br />Ordinance that will be presented to City Council at it's next meeting for consideration of <br />introduction. ~ <br /> <br />Case /fT: Adopt ordinance :AdOpting The Minnesota State Building Code: <br /> <br />Building Official Glyn Huff was presont and stated that in reviewing the building codes, it <br />came to the attention of.City gtaffttia't.the State Building Code does not make an>, <br />exceptions to the 65% plan review fee; the City is currently charging 45% for residential <br />plan reviews and 65% for ¢iommcrc~alPlan reviews. City Staff is recommending adoption <br />of an ordinance to bring the, City into compliance with State Building Code with respect to <br />plan review fees and establishing a prOcedUre of annually reviewing that fee and amending <br />it by resolution. Glyn n9ted that :it is not mandatory for cities to adopt the Uniform <br />Building Code (UBC). <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca inquired as:to:Why the City can't adopt just parts of the UBC. <br /> <br />Glyn Huff replied that by not adOpting the UBC, the City has the potential to sacrifice <br />health, safety and welfarebecauSe thg code is constantly changing. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Pear_soo and !seconded by Councilmember Peterson to adopt <br />Ordinance #89-27 adopting the Minnesota State Building Code. Providing for it's <br />administration and enforcement: regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, <br />alteration, repair, movingi~removal; demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment use, <br />height, area and maintena~nce of all :buikdings and/or structures in the City of Ramsey: <br />providing for the issuance of pen'nits: and collection of fees therefore and providing <br />penalties for the violation thereof. <br /> <br /> City COuncil/NoVember 28, 1989 <br /> Page 9 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />